[Pw_forum] vc-relax + vdW-DF2. PWSCF v.6.1

Ronald Cohen rcohen at carnegiescience.edu
Tue Oct 31 21:27:32 CET 2017


In 6.2 compiled with -DSPIN_BALANCED  rvv10 seems to work fine with DFT+U but DF2 with spin_balanced gives stresses that do not converge. The error is not large but finite:
df2 dft+u
     total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   24.12
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   24.96
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.25
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.47
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.80
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.41
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.43
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.30
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.28
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.13
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.33
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.44
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   25.49
rvv10 (same system and setup) converges fine (still running):
  total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=  105.54
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=  -36.11
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=  -37.82
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=    5.90
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   -2.78
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   -8.11
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   -5.48
          total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=   -1.83

---
Ronald Cohen
Extreme Materials Initiative
Geophysical Laboratory
Carnegie Institution
5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20015
rcohen at carnegiescience.edu <mailto:rcohen at carnegiescience.edu>
office: 202-478-8937
skype: ronaldcohen

> On 27 Oct 2017, at 15:10, Paolo Giannozzi <p.giannozzi at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Please delete Modules/xc_vdW_DF.o and PW/src/stres_nonloc_dft.o, recompile with -D__SPIN_BALANCED
> 
> Paolo
> 
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Ronald Cohen <rcohen at carnegiescience.edu <mailto:rcohen at carnegiescience.edu>> wrote:
> I still get:
>  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>      Error in routine stres_vdW_DF (1):
>      vdW stress not implemented for nspin > 1
>  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> 
>      stopping ...
>      Performing spin-balanced Ecnl stress calculation!
> 
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>      Error in routine stres_vdW_DF (1):
>      vdW stress not implemented for nspin > 1
>  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> 
>      stopping ...
> ---
> Ronald Cohen
> Extreme Materials Initiative
> Geophysical Laboratory
> Carnegie Institution
> 5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. <https://maps.google.com/?q=5251+Broad+Branch+Rd.,+N.W.+Washington,+D.C.+20015&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Washington, D.C. 20015 <https://maps.google.com/?q=5251+Broad+Branch+Rd.,+N.W.+Washington,+D.C.+20015&entry=gmail&source=g>
> rcohen at carnegiescience.edu <mailto:rcohen at carnegiescience.edu>
> office: 202-478-8937 <tel:(202)%20478-8937>
> skype: ronaldcohen
> 
>> On 27 Oct 2017, at 07:14, Prof. Dr. Ronald Cohen <r.cohen at lmu.de <mailto:r.cohen at lmu.de>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi! I compiled qe 6.2 with -D__SPIN_BALANCE but I still get:
>>     from stres_vdW_DF : error #         1
>>      vdW stress not implemented for nspin > 1
>> Should I just take out that error in the code and let it try to run?
>> 
>> Attached is my input and output.  Thanks!
>> 
>> Ron
>> 
>> ---
>> Professor Dr. Ronald Cohen
>> Ludwig Maximilians Universität
>> Theresienstrasse 41 Room <https://maps.google.com/?q=Theresienstrasse+41+Room%C2%A0207&entry=gmail&source=g> 207 <https://maps.google.com/?q=Theresienstrasse+41+Room%C2%A0207&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften
>> München
>> 80333
>> Deutschland
>> 
>> office: +49 089 2180 4294 <tel:+49%2089%2021804294>
>> ronald.cohen at min.uni-muenchen.de <mailto:ronald.cohen at min.uni-muenchen.de>
>> skypename: ronaldcohen
>> 
>> 
>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 11:27, Bogdan Yavorskyy <Bogdan.Yavorskyy at lrz.uni-muenchen.de <mailto:Bogdan.Yavorskyy at lrz.uni-muenchen.de>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> 
>>>> From: Paolo Giannozzi <p.giannozzi at gmail.com <mailto:p.giannozzi at gmail.com>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] vc-relax + vdW-DF2. PWSCF v.6.1
>>>> Date: 24 October 2017 at 17:24:41 CEST
>>>> To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:pw_forum at pwscf.org>>
>>>> Cc: bogdan.yavorskyy at lrz.uni-muenchen.de <mailto:bogdan.yavorskyy at lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
>>>> 
>>>> In the 6.2 version, it is possible to use the "spin-balanced" approach, setting the -D__SPIN_BALANCED precompilation flag at compile time. This allows to compute the stress. Some explanation by Per Hyldgaard:
>>>> 
>>>> "There is an Occam's razor argument for keeping the full spin vdW-DF formulation (from the PRL 115, 136402 (2015)) as standard: that the vdW-DF method be used and thus tested without options that lies outside the logic of the construction. In the present vdW-DF framework the aforementioned PRL give the one spin vdW-DF formulation that is compatible with spin scaling of exchange.
>>>> 
>>>> On the other hand, one can certainly vc-relax in the spin-balanced approach and then do sanity checks on the resulting  structure afterwards."
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Bogdan Yavorskyy <Bogdan.Yavorskyy at lrz.uni-muenchen.de <mailto:Bogdan.Yavorskyy at lrz.uni-muenchen.de>> wrote:
>>>> Dear Developers,
>>>> 
>>>> in the PWSCF code v.6.1 the possibility to relax cell parameters (vc-relax) together with van der Waals functional, input_dft=' vdW-DF2’ 
>>>> for magnetic systems (nspin=2) is not implemented. While this option is highly desirable for my research, I would kindly ask You if You are going to include this possibility in the future version?
>>>> 
>>>> Many thanks in advance,
>>>> Bogdan Yavorskyy.
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pw_forum mailing list
>>>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>>>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
>>>> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy <https://maps.google.com/?q=Udine,+via+delle+Scienze+208,+33100+Udine,+Italy&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>> Phone +39-0432-558216 <tel:+39%200432%20558216>, fax +39-0432-558222 <tel:+39%200432%20558222>
>>>> 
>>> 
>> <F10C20H10Fe2.vcrelax.in <http://f10c20h10fe2.vcrelax.in/>>
>> <F10C20H10Fe2.vcrelax.out>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171031/7ae89b52/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list