[Pw_forum] vc-relax
Giuseppe Mattioli
giuseppe.mattioli at ism.cnr.it
Fri Oct 20 13:51:37 CEST 2017
Dear Ibrahim
There is a further thing you can do. I see that after 100 steps the
scf is not converged yet but it is not so far from convergence. You
can carefully try to force the geometry step by using this in your input
electron_maxstep=100
scf_must_converge=.false.,
When things work well you displace the atoms along forces that are not
highly accurate, but you are still so far from convergence that the
accuracy for this first step is quite reasonable. In a couple of BFGS
steps you usually obtain a structure that converges (more or less)
smoothly within 100 scf steps.
conv_thr=1.0d-8
Let me add one last word on the convergence of wavefunctions. As a
rule of thumb you can consider 1.0d-7 a good threshold for energy and
eigenvalues (scf calculations), 1.0d-8 for forces (relax), 1.0d-9 for
stress (vc-relax). However, remember that conv_thr is a *starting
value* that is decreased down to two orders of magnitude below the
provided value when BFGS is approaching convergence. This avoids that
too tight criteria create problems such as yours in the very first
steps. For "normal" vc-relax calculations conv_thr=1.0d-7 is usually a
sensible choice, but you can use up to 1.0d-5 and restart the
calculation with a lower value after a few steps.
Best Wishes
Giuseppe
Quoting Ibrahim Yahaya Muhammad <ibrahimyahayamuhammad at gmail.com>:
> Dear Giuseppe,
> Thanks a lot for answering. I include all the correction and I successfully
> solved for bilayer MoS2 but I'm still having problem with 'vc-relax'
> calculation for 7 layers MoS2. Attached is the input and output.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ibrahim Yahaya Muhammad
GIUSEPPE MATTIOLI
CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
I-00015 - Monterotondo Scalo (RM)
Mob (*preferred*) +39 373 7305625
Tel + 39 06 90672342 - Fax +39 06 90672316
E-mail: <giuseppe.mattioli at ism.cnr.it>
More information about the users
mailing list