[Pw_forum] question regarding nbnd option
B S Bhushan
ecebhushan at gmail.com
Thu Nov 2 07:45:40 CET 2017
Thank you so much Dr. chen.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Jia Chen <jiachenchem at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Bhushan,
>
> It refers to valance electrons here.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:54 AM, B S Bhushan <ecebhushan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear experts,
>>
>> In the manual it was given as,
>> *Default:* for an insulator, nbnd
>> <http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/Doc/INPUT_PW.html#nbnd> =
>> number of valence bands (nbnd
>> <http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/Doc/INPUT_PW.html#nbnd>
>> =* # of electrons* /2);
>> for a metal, 20% more (minimum 4 more)
>>
>> My doubt here is, doest the *# of electrons* refer to valance electrons
>> or the total number of electrons (core+valance) in the structure ??
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> B. S. Bhushan
>> Ph.D scholar,
>> ABV-IIITM, Gwalior, India.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171102/2d1f3c70/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list