[Pw_forum] convergence can't achieved with QE6.0.2 and 5.4.0
Matteo Cococcioni
matteo at umn.edu
Fri May 5 11:36:27 CEST 2017
I'm pretty sure forces and stresses were tested in all +U flavors, at least
for the version of the code where they were originally implemented.
It is true that +U typically leads to the creation of several local minima
and maybe this makes the convergence harder. However, I have never seen
a total force staying so constant (and big) as you show. Are the ions
moving at all? How big is your trust radius?
Does the relaxation converge if you set Hubbard_J0 = 0?
Also, is "exxdiv_treatment = 'gygi-baldereschi' " needed?
Matteo
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Lorenzo Paulatto <
lorenzo.paulatto at impmc.upmc.fr> wrote:
> On Friday, 5 May 2017 09:26:53 CEST Q.J.Wang wrote:
> > lda_plus_u_kind = 0 ,
> > Hubbard_U(3) = 4.5,
> > Hubbard_J0(3) = 0.5,
> >...
> > The total force seems nearly invariable. I also use QE5.4.0 to run the
> input
> > file, the total force still can't converge after 300 scf cycles and 2
> bfgs
> > steps.
>
> My guess is that there is an inconsistency between LDA+U energy and forces,
> which prevents the BFGS calculation from converging.
>
> kind regards
>
> --
> Dr. Lorenzo Paulatto
> IdR @ IMPMC -- CNRS & Université Paris 6
> phone: +33 (0)1 442 79822 / skype: paulatz
> www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
> mail: 23-24/423 Boîte courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cédex 05
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170505/5140e89a/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list