[Pw_forum] Need help with Supercell calculation
sayan chaudhuri
csayan895 at gmail.com
Fri May 5 05:44:38 CEST 2017
Sir,
Thanks a lot.
I used a 8*8*8 k point mesh for scf calculation and 16*16*16 for nscf run.
The total energy coming in the primitive case was -804.22984404 Ry and in
current supercell case it is -3216.91979680 Ry.
Thanking you,
Sayan Chaudhuri
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Ari P Seitsonen <Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi>
wrote:
>
> Dear Sayan Chaudhuri,
>
> At least both the cut-off energies should be the same in both
> calculations. I did not check the inputs in more detail, for example if the
> k point sets are consistent. If yes, the total energy in the larger system
> should be very close to four times the total energy of the primitive cell.
>
> Greetings,
>
>
> apsi
>
> -=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=
> -=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
> Ari Paavo Seitsonen / Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
> Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Département de Chimie, Paris
> Mobile (F) : +33 789 37 24 25 (CH) : +41 79 71 90 935
>
>
> On Thu, 4 May 2017, sayan chaudhuri wrote:
>
> Sir,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response. I will make the correction. Is there
>> anything other correction I have
>> to make?
>>
>> Thanking you,
>> Sayan Chaudhuri
>>
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Ari P Seitsonen <Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Sayan Chaudhuri,
>>
>> If you multiply the number of cells by four, shouldn't you also
>> multiply
>> 'tot_magnetization' by four too?
>>
>> Greetings from Rabat/Morocco,
>>
>> apsi
>>
>> -=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=
>> -=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
>> Ari Paavo Seitsonen / Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi /
>> http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
>> Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Département de Chimie, Paris
>> Mobile (F) : +33 789 37 24 25 (CH) : +41 79 71 90 935
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 4 May 2017, sayan chaudhuri wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am calculating DOS structure for a heusler alloy
>> Fe2TiSb. When I am not
>> using a supercell I am
>> getting the same result reported previously, but after using
>> a supercell I am
>> getting very different
>> result.
>> I am attaching the scf files and DOS output for both the
>> cases. Please tell me
>> what mistakes I am doing
>> while considering the supercell. The one with _sup in the
>> name, contains
>> supercell.
>>
>> Thanking you in advance,
>> Sayan Chaudhuri
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170505/f06d51cf/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list