[Pw_forum] A problem with HOMO and LUMO for CdS
Nicola Marzari
nicola.marzari at epfl.ch
Tue Jun 6 12:31:03 CEST 2017
Not sure,
but:
k-points are weird: 20x20x1 for a bulk system - 20x20x20 or 20x20x16
would seem more sensible
128 bands means 256 electrons in your unit cell - but you have only
4 atoms. Better leave it undeclared, so that the code calculates those
for you.
Also, maybe Troullier-Martins pseudos are not the best choice - look
at the SSSP tables to choose them, and remember that if
not-normconserving ecutrho needs to be quite a bit larger than 4 times
ecutwfc - 6 to 12 times, typically. SSSP will tell you the optimal cutoff.
Last, which structure did you use? The code doesn't find any symmetry
operation, and that's also suspicious.
nicola
On 06/06/2017 10:49, Olga Sedelnikova wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I have made a scf calculation for wurtzite CdS. After convergence, I
> found that the HOMO lies above the LUMO
> (highest occupied, lowest unoccupied level (ev): 9.9201 8.8829).
>
> Could you suggest the source of such strange result?
>
> --
> Thanks and regards,
> Olga Sedelnikova
> Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Nicola Marzari, Chair of Theory and Simulation of Materials, EPFL
Director, National Centre for Competence in Research NCCR MARVEL, EPFL
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Contact http://nccr-marvel.ch/en/project
More information about the users
mailing list