[Pw_forum] Pseudopotential for indium

Nicola Marzari nicola.marzari at epfl.ch
Wed Dec 6 23:24:43 CET 2017


Dear Pascal,


the comparison with all-electron calculations looks good to me - see
here for tests and for the other pseudos:
http://materialscloud.org/sssp/results/In_conv_patt.png

Comparing with expts is more delicate -  c/a with PBE is
quite a bit off e.g. in ferroelectric perovskites.

Re the alloy, how are you constructing the intermediate concentrations?
Supercells? (Vegard law should hold)

nicola

On 06/12/2017 23:03, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
> You mean: the value 49.0 here?
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> In 49.0 In.pbe-dn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
> Iit is used only by molecular dynamics, not by structural optimization.
> 
> I don't remember In to be an especially nasty element, at least for 
> simple III-V compounds like InAs. I would examine the effect of a denser 
> k-point grid, and of spin-orbit
> 
> Paolo
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Saif Ullah <kiterunner7 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:kiterunner7 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Dear Boulet,
> 
>     I think I found where the error is. You are using the atomic number
>     of In instead of its atomic mass.
> 
>     Regards
>     Saif
>     Department of physics, UFJF, Brazil
> 
> 
> 
>     On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Pascal Boulet
>     <pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr <mailto:pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr>> wrote:
> 
>         Thanks Lorenzo for the suggestion. I have tried with Ecut=120 Ry
>         and Ecutrho=1200 Ry. I get a slightly better result (but c is
>         still very bad):
>         3.2168 x 3.2168 x 5.3095
> 
>         as compared with:
>         exp.: 3.2449 x 3.2449 x 4.9420 angström
>         previous calc.: 3.2715 x 3.2715 x 5.4541 angström
> 
> 
>         Best,
> 
>         Pascal Boulet
>>         /Professor in computational chemistry - DEPARTEMENT OF CHEMISTRY/
>         Aix-Marseille University - ST JEROME - Avenue Escadrille
>         Normandie Niemen - F-13013 Marseille - FRANCE
>         Tél: +33(0)4 13 55 18 10 <tel:+33%204%2013%2055%2018%2010> - Fax
>         : +33(0)4 13 55 18 50 <tel:+33%204%2013%2055%2018%2050>
>         Site : http://madirel.univ-amu.fr/pages_web_BOULET_PASCAL/infos
>         <http://madirel.univ-amu.fr/pages_web_BOULET_PASCAL/infos> -
>         Email : pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr <mailto:pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         Le 6 déc. 2017 à 18:54, Lorenzo Paulatto <paulatz at gmail.com
>         <mailto:paulatz at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> 
>>         Hello,
>>         can you try with a much higher cutoff (100 Ry or more) and see
>>         if the lattice parameter improves? I've noticed that sometimes
>>         pslibrary pseudos are much a harder than they look, especially
>>         when converging stress
>>
>>         Cheers
>>
>>         -- 
>>         Lorenzo Paulatto
>>         Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers
>>
>>         On Dec 6, 2017 18:32, "Pascal Boulet"
>>         <pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr <mailto:pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr>>
>>         wrote:
>>
>>             Dear all,
>>
>>             We are working on some In-containing semiconductors
>>             M(1-x)In(x)L. M is supposed to be a smaller atom than In.
>>             We are facing the problem that when we vary x from 0 to 1
>>             the cell parameters is decreasing instead of increasing.
>>             Although this may happen, it should not be the case here
>>             since ‘pure’ ML has a smaller cell parameter than ‘pure’ InL.
>>
>>             We have run some calculations on crystal indium using the
>>             PSL library pseudo potentials (both PAW and USPP). one of
>>             the calculated cell parameters are miles away from the
>>             experimental ones:
>>             exp.: 3.2449 x 3.2449 x 4.9420 angström
>>             calc.: 3.2715 x 3.2715 x 5.4541 angström
>>
>>             Does anyone have tested the In pseudo potentials of the
>>             PSL library or faced this problem with indium?
>>
>>             Thank you for your help and time.
>>
>>             Best regards
>>
>>             PS1. here are some information from the input file:
>>
>>              calculation    = 'vc-relax’,
>>               etot_conv_thr  = 1d-7,
>>               forc_conv_thr  = 5d-5,
>>               ibrav          = 0,
>>                nat            = 2,
>>               ntyp           = 1,
>>               ecutwfc        = 45.d0,
>>               ecutrho        = 450.d0,
>>               nbnd = 18
>>             &ELECTRONS
>>               conv_thr       = 1d-8,
>>             &CELL
>>               press_conv_thr = 0.01d0,
>>               cell_factor    = 1.5,
>>             ATOMIC_SPECIES
>>             In 49.0 In.pbe-dn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
>>             K_POINTS automatic
>>             8 8 4 1 1 1
>>             CELL_PARAMETERS angstroms
>>             3.2449 0. 0.
>>             0. 3.2449 0.
>>             0. 0. 4.9420
>>             ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>>                 In           0.00000000    0.00000000    0.00000000
>>                 In           0.50000000    0.50000000    0.50000000
>>
>>             PS2. And some from the output:
>>
>>                 bfgs converged in  18 scf cycles and  15 bfgs steps
>>                  (criteria: energy <  1.0E-07 Ry, force <
>>              5.0E-05Ry/Bohr, cell <  1.0E-02kbar)
>>             CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)
>>                3.271466870   0.000000000   0.000000000
>>                0.000000000   3.271466870   0.000000000
>>                0.000000000   0.000000000   5.454067219
>>             !    total energy              =    -821.46750731 Ry
>>             total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)    
>>             P=    0.30
>>
>>             Pascal Boulet
>>>>             /Professor in computational chemistry - DEPARTEMENT OF
>>             CHEMISTRY/
>>             Aix-Marseille University - ST JEROME - Avenue Escadrille
>>             Normandie Niemen - F-13013 Marseille - FRANCE
>>             Tél: +33(0)4 13 55 18 10 <tel:04%2013%2055%2018%2010> -
>>             Fax : +33(0)4 13 55 18 50 <tel:04%2013%2055%2018%2050>
>>             Site :
>>             http://madirel.univ-amu.fr/pages_web_BOULET_PASCAL/infos
>>             <http://madirel.univ-amu.fr/pages_web_BOULET_PASCAL/infos> -
>>             Email : pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr
>>             <mailto:pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Pw_forum mailing list
>>             Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>>             http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>             <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Pw_forum mailing list
>>         Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>>         http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>         <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>
> 
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         Pw_forum mailing list
>         Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>         http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>         <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Pw_forum mailing list
>     Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>     http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>     <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> 


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Nicola Marzari, Chair of Theory and Simulation of Materials, EPFL
Director, National Centre for Competence in Research NCCR MARVEL, EPFL
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Contact http://nccr-marvel.ch/en/project



More information about the users mailing list