[Pw_forum] SCF Convergence Criteria

[Lorenzo Paulatto]

Are you doing a relax calculation? If yes, check the upscale parameter in
the doc

-- 
Lorenzo Paulatto
Written on a virtual keyboard with real fingers

On Dec 6, 2017 18:28, "David Foster" <davidfoster751 at yahoo.com> wrote:

Hi
I have set "Conv_Thr" to 1.0D-5 in my calculation. As you see follow, the
estimated scf change is less than 10^(-5) but it has not been converged!!!
Is there any criteria for SCF convergence in the code which has not been
documented in the manual?



======
total cpu time spent up to now is     8119.0 secs

     total energy              =  -16045.57783278 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =  -16045.57783128 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <       0.00000207 Ry

     total magnetization       =    -0.01 Bohr mag/cell
     absolute magnetization    =    79.80 Bohr mag/cell

     iteration #164     ecut=   140.00 Ry     beta=0.01
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  3.21E-10,  avg # of iterations =  2.0

     total cpu time spent up to now is     8138.3 secs

     total energy              =  -16045.57783497 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =  -16045.57783360 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <       0.00000201 Ry

     total magnetization       =    -0.01 Bohr mag/cell
     absolute magnetization    =    79.80 Bohr mag/cell

     iteration #165     ecut=   140.00 Ry     beta=0.01
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  3.21E-10,  avg # of iterations =  2.0

=================================


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20171206/204f6615/attachment.html>