[Pw_forum] ecutrho <= ecutwfc?!?

Jingyang Wang jw598 at cornell.edu
Mon May 23 18:36:53 CEST 2016

Dear Paolo,

Thanks for the suggestion! I have just run the job on 1 processor, and it
apparently have passed the initial stage of cutoff self-consistency
checking. (see attached). Since the smallest computation unit (node) has 16
processors on Stampede, I ran the job on a different cluster with QE 5.1.
On Stampede, I have run the same job on 1 node (16 procs), and the output
passed the initial stage as well before it ends.


Jingyang 'Mark' Wang
School of Applied and Engineering Physics
Cornell University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160523/9ca3ab3f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Si_In_+1.out
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 22992 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160523/9ca3ab3f/attachment.obj>

More information about the users mailing list