[Pw_forum] Volume Optimisation :-Reg
Suresh A
suresh2007pgp19 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 16 07:27:16 CET 2016
Dear All,
I have optimized the structure for anatase simple tetragonal.
The optimiized lattice parameters are a= 3.754336A. c=9.193631522694A. but
the experimental values are a= 3.785A, c=9.514A. There is big difference in
c value for optimised strucutre.But the same calculation for GGA pseudo
potential gives the lattice parameter values which are good with
experimental values. In literature previous results for LDA has good
lattice parameter values.
Which parameter I have to change in order to get good results for LDA?
Below is my input and the version i have used is 5.2.1
&CONTROL
title = 'anatase' ,
calculation = 'vc-relax' ,
restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
pseudo_dir = '/home/suresh/GN2/',
outdir
='/home/suresh/Desktop/ashahicheck/asahiopt/tmp/',
prefix = 'anatase' ,
tstress = .true. ,
tprnfor = .true. ,
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 6,
A = 3.692,
C = 9.471 ,
nat = 12,
ntyp = 2,
ecutwfc = 60 ,
exxdiv_treatment = 'none' ,
/
&ELECTRONS
/
&IONS
ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
/
&CELL
cell_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Ti 47.86700 Ti.pz-mt_fhi.UPF
O 15.99940 O.pz-mt_fhi.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Ti 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
Ti 0.5000000 0.0000000 0.7500000
Ti 0.0000000 0.5000000 0.2500000
Ti 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.5000000
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.2066000
O 0.5000000 0.0000000 0.5434000
O 0.0000000 0.5000000 0.4566000
O 0.5000000 0.0000000 0.9566000
O 0.0000000 0.5000000 0.0434000
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.7934000
O 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.7066000
O 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.2934000
K_POINTS automatic
4 4 2 1 1 1
Thanks in advance.
With Regards,
A.Suresh,
Research Scholar,
Madurai Kamaraj University,
Madurai.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160216/6fe66911/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list