[Pw_forum] Problem with QE-5.2.1 in building exx routines

[Mahmoud Payami Shabestari]

I went through all the "exx_*.f90" routines and it seems the problem was not 
what I mentioned in my last post. However, whatever the cause of the error 
is, it is in these routines (I do not know the exact reason). Maybe there is 
some small programming error which is ignored by newer versions of 
compilers?!
-----Original Message-----
From: Lorenzo Paulatto <lorenzo.paulatto at impmc.upmc.fr>
To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:23:30 +0100
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Problem with QE-5.2.1 in building exx routines


On 8 Feb 2016 11:41 a.m., "Mahmoud Payami Shabestari" <mpayami at aeoi.org.ir 
[mailto:mpayami at aeoi.org.ir]> wrote:
>
> Ciao Paolo,
> Thank you very much for your reply.
> As it is mentioned in the UG-5.3.0, "Also, compilers that do not support 
intrinsic calls flush, get_environment_variable,get_command_argument, 
command_argument_count are no longer supported since v.5.2.1.", the old 
compiler complains about "internal error" which most probably is due to the 
above-mentioned calls present in "exx_X.f90" routines in the CP package.
This is very unlikely, there are no calls to those intrinsic functions in 
EXX, and even if there were, they wouldn't cause an internal compiler error. 
Upgrade your compiler or ask your system administrator if you cannot.
For others there is no problem.
> Thank you again,
> mahmoud
>  
>>
>>  
>> Hi Mahmoud, it depends upon the kind of problem. If it is an "internal 
compiler error", there is little that can be done. What does the old 
compiler complain about exactly? Paolo
>> Dear QE users and developers,
>>  
>> Kindly, I encountered with some problems in compiling the CP package 
using Intel ifort-11.1.080. The problem is referred to some line in 
exx_psi.f90.
>> However, using a newer version of Intel Compiler such as Compxe-2013, the 
compilation proceeds without any problem.
>> Is there any simple solution other than moving to new versions of 
compilers? 
>> Any suggestions is highly appreciated.
>>  
>> Mahmoud Payami
>> Theoretical and Computational Physics Group
>> AEOI, Tehran, Iran
>>  
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org [mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org]
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum 
[http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org [mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org]
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum 
[http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160209/f72f3f39/attachment.html>