[Pw_forum] "q mesh breaks symmetry" error even with q mesh being the same as k mesh
stefano de gironcoli
degironc at sissa.it
Tue Aug 9 02:59:47 CEST 2016
I think that given your Bravais lattice nk3 must be equal to nk1
so
10 nk2 10 0 0 0
or
6 nk2 6 0 0 0
should be fine
10 nk2 6 0 0 0
is not
the automatic unfolding of a grid generate additional points but this
does not mean they form a regular grid. think about what happens for an
hexagonal lattice with a shifted grid.
stefano
On 08/08/2016 17:51, Thomas Brumme wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I want to calculate the phonon frequencies on a regular q mesh specified
> by using
> ldisp=.true. and the nq1, nq2, nq3 variables. Yet, I always get the error
>
> q-mesh breaks symmetry
>
> even if the grid has the same dimensions as the k mesh in the PWscf
> calculation.
> This is weird as the q mesh is exactly the same as the k mesh, which was
> created
> by applying the symmetries to a regular grid. The system is LCO and the
> input for
> PWscf (in the reduced cell) is:
>
> &control
> calculation = 'scf',
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch',
> prefix = 'LCO',
> pseudo_dir = './',
> outdir = './tmp/',
> nstep = 300,
> wf_collect = .true.,
> /
> &system
> ibrav = 0,
> nat = 14,
> ntyp = 3,
> ecutwfc = 200,
> occupations = 'smearing',
> smearing = 'gauss',
> degauss = 0.01,
> nspin = 2,
> starting_magnetization(3) = 0.02,
> nr1 = 128,
> nr2 = 128,
> nr3 = 128,
> /
> &electrons
> electron_maxstep = 250,
> diagonalization = 'cg',
> conv_thr = 1.0d-10,
> /
> CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)
> 5.261112503 0.000000000 0.000000000
> 0.000000000 5.330947322 0.000000000
> -2.630556252 -0.000000000 6.548827231
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> La 138.90547 La1.UPF
> O 15.999 O.pz-n-mt.UPF
> Cu 63.546 Cu1.UPF
> K_POINTS automatic
> 10 10 6 0 0 0
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
> ...
>
> I defined the FFT grid by hand since then the code does not drop the
> symmetries
> including fractional translations... Could this be the problem? Or that
> I did choose
> a FFT grid which has the same number of points in x/y/z directions? Or
> could this
> be due to a similar problem" as in hexagonal crystals where shifting the
> k mesh
> away from Gamma is a bad idea? Or is there an obvious error in my input
> for ph.x:
>
> &inputph
> tr2_ph = 1.0d-18,
> prefix = 'LCO',
> amass(1) = 138.90547,
> amass(2) = 15.999,
> amass(3) = 63.546,
> outdir = './tmp/',
> fildyn = 'LCO.dynG',
> ldisp=.true.,
> nq1=10, nq2=10, nq3=6,
> fildvscf = 'LCO.dvscf',
> verbosity = 'high',
> /
>
> I searched the archive however I couldn't find a solution to my problem.
> Thus, any
> help would be very much appreciated :)
>
> Regards
>
> Thomas
>
More information about the users
mailing list