[Pw_forum] under estimation of band gap by B3LYP
MSaqlain
saqlain at bilkent.edu.tr
Mon Aug 8 21:02:14 CEST 2016
Dear Users
I have been performing some test calculations. However, with QE, B3LYP
functional and NC pseudopotentials, I could not reproduce the same band
gap as reported in literature. Here I am reproducing the input file. any
comments to improve the band gap? Which parameters needed improvement?
&CONTROL
title = 'MaPbI' ,
calculation = 'scf' ,
restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
outdir = '/home/saqlain/tempo' ,
wfcdir = '/home/saqlain/tempo' ,
pseudo_dir = '/home/saqlain/psp' ,
prefix = 'b3lyp' ,
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 0,
celldm(1) = 1.8897265,
nat = 12,
ntyp = 5,
ecutwfc = 50 ,
input_dft = 'b3lyp' ,
occupations = 'smearing' ,
degauss = 0.0001 ,
smearing = 'marzari-vanderbilt' ,
ecutfock = 30 ,
exxdiv_treatment = 'none' ,
x_gamma_extrapolation = .false. ,
nqx1 = 1 ,
nqx2 = 1 ,
nqx3 = 1 ,
/
&ELECTRONS
/
CELL_PARAMETERS alat=
5.834378366 -0.000211726 0.108920456
-0.000213390 5.806855246 -0.000143936
0.110146117 -0.000149302 5.840640322
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.00000 C.pbe-hgh.UPF
H 1.00000 H.pbe-hgh.UPF
N 15.00000 N.pbe-hgh.UPF
I 126.90000 I.pbe-hgh.UPF
Pb 207.20000 Pb.pbe-hgh.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
C 0.899741813 0.999991644 0.939354291
N 0.116681857 0.999940194 0.066032205
H 0.942935032 0.999553134 0.756571178
H 0.803255510 0.154306973 -0.013215230
H 0.802828226 0.846094729 -0.012606338
H 0.216099629 0.144436130 1.027340470
H 0.215788061 0.855133747 1.027684059
H 0.086425041 0.000193283 0.241051451
Pb 0.474903357 0.499901389 0.490387142
I 0.462890134 0.499954443 0.989933585
I 0.482308382 -0.000094786 0.507160765
I 0.974122976 0.499891124 0.476094414
K_POINTS automatic
2 2 2 1 1 1
Regards
Msaqlain
Bilkent Uni. Ankara
More information about the users
mailing list