[Pw_forum] Parity wave function

Mohsen Modaresi modaresi.mohsen at gmail.com
Sat Sep 12 17:23:51 CEST 2015


Hi Andrea,

Thank you so much for your help.
I solve my problem. Actually as you said for parity the wave function and
atomic position must have space inversion. I modify the atomic position to
have space inversion around the ( 0 0 0) and get the new character table as
below (Now parities are printed)

 **************************************************************************

                    xk=(   0.00000,   0.00000,   0.00000  )

     double point group C_2h (2/m)
     there are  8 classes and  4 irreducible representations
     the character table:

       E     -E    C2    -C2   i     -i    s_h   -s_h

G_3+   1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00
G_4+   1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00
G_3-   1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00 -1.00  1.00  0.00  0.00
G_4-   1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00 -1.00  1.00  0.00  0.00

     imaginary part

       E     -E    C2    -C2   i     -i    s_h   -s_h

G_3+   0.00  0.00  1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00 -1.00
G_4+   0.00  0.00 -1.00  1.00  0.00  0.00 -1.00  1.00
G_3-   0.00  0.00  1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00 -1.00  1.00
G_4-   0.00  0.00 -1.00  1.00  0.00  0.00  1.00 -1.00

     the symmetry operations in each class and the name of the first
element:

     E             1

     -E           -1

     C2            2

     -C2          -2

     i             3

     -i           -3

     s_h           4

     -s_h         -4


     Band symmetry, C_2h (2/m)  double point group:

     e(  1 -  2) =    -24.27957  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e(  1 -  2) =    -24.27957  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e(  3 -  4) =    -24.27797  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e(  3 -  4) =    -24.27797  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e(  5 -  6) =    -24.24436  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e(  5 -  6) =    -24.24436  eV     2   --> G_4-
     e(  7 -  8) =    -24.17457  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e(  7 -  8) =    -24.17457  eV     2   --> G_4-
     e(  9 - 10) =    -23.33303  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e(  9 - 10) =    -23.33303  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e( 11 - 12) =    -23.24491  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e( 11 - 12) =    -23.24491  eV     2   --> G_4-
     e( 13 - 14) =    -23.18845  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e( 13 - 14) =    -23.18845  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e( 15 - 16) =    -23.15844  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e( 15 - 16) =    -23.15844  eV     2   --> G_4-
     e( 17 - 18) =    -23.12254  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e( 17 - 18) =    -23.12254  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e( 19 - 20) =    -23.04160  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e( 19 - 20) =    -23.04160  eV     2   --> G_4-
     e( 21 - 22) =    -11.66446  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e( 21 - 22) =    -11.66446  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e( 23 - 24) =     -5.60676  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e( 23 - 24) =     -5.60676  eV     2   --> G_4-
     e( 25 - 26) =     -2.92680  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e( 25 - 26) =     -2.92680  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e( 27 - 28) =     -2.46335  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e( 27 - 28) =     -2.46335  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e( 29 - 30) =     -2.18534  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e( 29 - 30) =     -2.18534  eV     2   --> G_4-
     e( 31 - 32) =     -0.42567  eV     2   --> G_3+
     e( 31 - 32) =     -0.42567  eV     2   --> G_4+
     e( 33 - 34) =      0.65591  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e( 33 - 34) =      0.65591  eV     2   --> G_4-
     e( 35 - 36) =      0.94427  eV     2   --> G_3-
     e( 35 - 36) =      0.94427  eV     2   --> G_4-

 **************************************************************************

Thanks for your help.

Best

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Andrea Dal Corso <dalcorso at sissa.it> wrote:

> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 11:47 +0200, Andrea Dal Corso wrote:
> > The group should have inversion to check the parity with respect
> > inversion symmetry. You can have all the information that are in the
> > character tables when you know how a wavefunction
>
> Sorry, I meant ... when you know according to which representation a
> wavefunction transform ..,
>
> > but which information is of interest to you depends
> > on your problem, it cannot be found in a QE manual.
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:59 +0430, Mohsen Modaresi wrote:
> > > Hi Andrea,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your answer.
> > >
> > > In the bands out put,
> > >
> > >
> **************************************************************************
> > >
> > >                     xk=(   0.00000,   0.00000,   0.00000  )
> > >
> > >      double point group C_s (m)
> > >      there are  4 classes and  2 irreducible representations
> > >      the character table:
> > >
> > >        E     -E    s     -s
> > >
> > > G_3    1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00
> > > G_4    1.00 -1.00  0.00  0.00
> > >
> > >      imaginary part
> > >
> > >        E     -E    s     -s
> > >
> > > G_3    0.00  0.00  1.00 -1.00
> > > G_4    0.00  0.00 -1.00  1.00
> > >
> > >      the symmetry operations in each class and the name of the first
> > > element:
> > >
> > >      E             1
> > >
> > >      -E           -1
> > >
> > >      s             2
> > >
> > >      -s           -2
> > >
> > >
> > >      Band symmetry, C_s (m)     double point group:
> > >
> > >      e(  1 -  2) =    -27.61275  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e(  1 -  2) =    -27.61275  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e(  3 -  4) =    -27.58856  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e(  3 -  4) =    -27.58856  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e(  5 -  6) =    -26.57390  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e(  5 -  6) =    -26.57390  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e(  7 -  8) =    -26.48621  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e(  7 -  8) =    -26.48621  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e(  9 - 10) =    -26.25165  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e(  9 - 10) =    -26.25165  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 11 - 12) =    -26.23208  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 11 - 12) =    -26.23208  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 13 - 14) =    -25.55156  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 13 - 14) =    -25.55156  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 15 - 16) =    -25.46597  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 15 - 16) =    -25.46597  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 17 - 18) =    -25.45110  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 17 - 18) =    -25.45110  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 19 - 20) =    -25.42772  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 19 - 20) =    -25.42772  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 21 - 22) =    -25.11231  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 21 - 22) =    -25.11231  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 23 - 24) =    -25.02944  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 23 - 24) =    -25.02944  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 25 - 26) =    -13.43448  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 25 - 26) =    -13.43448  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 27 - 28) =    -10.07434  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 27 - 28) =    -10.07434  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 29 - 30) =     -8.47022  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 29 - 30) =     -8.47022  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 31 - 32) =     -8.15897  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 31 - 32) =     -8.15897  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 33 - 34) =     -8.08388  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 33 - 34) =     -8.08388  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 35 - 36) =     -7.98657  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 35 - 36) =     -7.98657  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 37 - 38) =     -7.93692  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 37 - 38) =     -7.93692  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 39 - 40) =     -5.34727  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 39 - 40) =     -5.34727  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 41 - 42) =     -4.91485  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 41 - 42) =     -4.91485  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 43 - 44) =     -4.52985  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 43 - 44) =     -4.52985  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 45 - 46) =     -3.10125  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 45 - 46) =     -3.10125  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 47 - 48) =     -1.48519  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 47 - 48) =     -1.48519  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >      e( 49 - 50) =     -1.22583  eV     2   --> G_3
> > >      e( 49 - 50) =     -1.22583  eV     2   --> G_4
> > >
> > >
> **************************************************************************
> > >
> > > Still the Parity is missing?
> > > I saw some articles that report the parity interpretation with QE
> (Although
> > > most of works are with VASP).
> > > Thanks for your help.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Andrea Dal Corso <dalcorso at sissa.it>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The numbers indicate, for each band, the number of the
> representation of
> > > > the small group of K. The character table for the point group is
> written
> > > > in the output of the bands.x program and the number corresponds to
> the
> > > > number of the representation in the character table.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >
> > > > Andrea
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:23 +0430, Mohsen Modaresi wrote:
> > > > > Dear users,
> > > > >
> > > > > I need parity wave of each bands of  band structure (in some
> specific K
> > > > > points known as TRIM points) [PRB 76, 045302] to determine the
> > > > > topological-->trivial phase transition.
> > > > > In 2013 some body ask about the parity and Prof. Giannozzi suggest
> to use
> > > > > bands.x. I did and get a .rap file. But I can not find any
> document to
> > > > > understand the out file.
> > > > > Here for example, I bring data file for one K point (Gama point).
> > > > > %%%
> > > > >            0.000000  0.000000  0.000000    T
> > > > >        1       2       1       2       1       2       1       2
> > > > > 1       2
> > > > >        1       2       1       2       1       2       1       2
> > > > > 1       2
> > > > >        1       2       1       2       1       2       1       2
> > > > > 1       2
> > > > >        1       2       1       2       1       2       1       2
> > > > > 1       2
> > > > >        1       2       1       2       1       2       1       2
> > > > > 1       2
> > > > > %%%
> > > > >
> > > > > any suggestion is appreciated.
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > Mohsen Modarresi,
> > > > > Department of Physics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
> > > > > Phone +98-913-345-2131
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Pw_forum mailing list
> > > > > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > > > > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrea Dal Corso                    Tel. 0039-040-3787428
> > > > SISSA, Via Bonomea 265              Fax. 0039-040-3787249
> > > > I-34136 Trieste (Italy)             e-mail: dalcorso at sissa.it
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pw_forum mailing list
> > > > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > > > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pw_forum mailing list
> > > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> >
>
> --
> Andrea Dal Corso                    Tel. 0039-040-3787428
> SISSA, Via Bonomea 265              Fax. 0039-040-3787249
> I-34136 Trieste (Italy)             e-mail: dalcorso at sissa.it
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>



Mohsen Modarresi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150912/da0ee02a/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list