[Pw_forum] Bizarre (and rather unexpected) absolute magnetization?
Van den Berg, Jan (JA)
jan.vandenberg at sasol.com
Wed Jul 15 14:53:55 CEST 2015
Dear PWscf users,
I am in the process of doing some LDA+U calculations on binary systems, and discovered a peculiar behaviour with Ru-based binary systems. I have been using the PAW pseudopotential Ru.pbe-spn-kjpaw_psl.0.3.0.UPF - it is not in the standard set, but available from THEOS under the PSEUDOPOTENTIALS_TOT/ directory. Aside from the fact that CG style diagonalization suffers (as seen from many iterations where eigenvalues are not converged), the bizarre result is seen in the absolute magnetization.
TYPICAL INPUT FILE:
&CONTROL
title = "single-point calculation"
calculation = 'scf'
prefix = "fcc-RuAl"
pseudo_dir = "~/mypseudo/"
wf_collect=.true.
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 0
nat = 4
ntyp = 3
ecutwfc = 80
occupations = 'smearing'
smearing = 'methfessel-paxton'
degauss = 0.01
nspin = 2
starting_magnetization(1) = 0.1,0.1,0.01
lda_plus_U=.true.
Hubbard_U(1)=1D-40,Hubbard_alpha(1)=1D-40
Hubbard_U(2)=1D-40,Hubbard_alpha(2)=1D-40
Hubbard_U(3)=1D-40,Hubbard_alpha(3)=1D-40
nosym_evc=.true.
/
&ELECTRONS
startingwfc='atomic+random'
startingpot='atomic'
conv_thr = 1.D-6
mixing_beta = 0.5D0
electron_maxstep = 4000
diagonalization = 'cg'
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Ru1 101.07 Ru.pbe-spn-kjpaw_psl.0.3.0.UPF
Ru2 101.07 Ru.pbe-spn-kjpaw_psl.0.3.0.UPF
Al1 26.982 Al.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.1.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Al1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ru1 0.0 0.5 0.5
Al1 0.5 0.0 0.5
Ru2 0.5 0.5 0.0
K_POINTS (automatic)
9 9 9 0 0 0
CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)
3.6 0.0 0.0
0.0 3.6 0.0
0.0 0.0 3.6
TYPICAL OUTPUT:
....
Iteration #3:
Magnetic moment per site:
atom: 1 charge: 1.5011 magn: 0.0183 constr: 0.0000
atom: 2 charge: 14.3856 magn: 0.4645 constr: 0.0000
atom: 3 charge: 1.4893 magn: 0.0330 constr: 0.0000
atom: 4 charge: 14.4619 magn: 0.4294 constr: 0.0000
total cpu time spent up to now is 618.8 secs
total energy = -5726.20306650 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -4814.95640865 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 25264.02550193 Ry
total magnetization = 0.11 Bohr mag/cell
absolute magnetization = 2115.04 Bohr mag/cell
Iteration #4:
Magnetic moment per site:
atom: 1 charge: 1.5539 magn: -0.0043 constr: 0.0000
atom: 2 charge: 14.7995 magn: 0.3472 constr: 0.0000
atom: 3 charge: 1.5631 magn: 0.0130 constr: 0.0000
atom: 4 charge: 14.1133 magn: 0.2910 constr: 0.0000
total cpu time spent up to now is 847.5 secs
total energy = -6800.82522725 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -5911.29292705 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 12707.95018218 Ry
total magnetization = -0.07 Bohr mag/cell
absolute magnetization = 1617.61 Bohr mag/cell
....
iteration #113 ecut= 80.00 Ry beta=0.50
CG style diagonalization
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
ethr = 1.00E-02, avg # of iterations = 3.1
negative rho (up, down): 8.618E+02 8.613E+02
Magnetic moment per site:
atom: 1 charge: 1.2423 magn: -0.0288 constr: 0.0000
atom: 2 charge: 15.6339 magn: -0.0550 constr: 0.0000
atom: 3 charge: 1.3867 magn: -0.0177 constr: 0.0000
atom: 4 charge: 15.5383 magn: -0.0419 constr: 0.0000
total cpu time spent up to now is 10453.0 secs
total energy = -8411.78286402 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -8410.36053542 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 28.63071702 Ry
total magnetization = -0.20 Bohr mag/cell
absolute magnetization = 144.41 Bohr mag/cell
iteration #114 ecut= 80.00 Ry beta=0.50
CG style diagonalization
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
ethr = 1.00E-02, avg # of iterations = 3.0
negative rho (up, down): 8.618E+02 8.614E+02
Magnetic moment per site:
atom: 1 charge: 1.2416 magn: -0.0288 constr: 0.0000
atom: 2 charge: 15.6333 magn: -0.0558 constr: 0.0000
atom: 3 charge: 1.3864 magn: -0.0179 constr: 0.0000
atom: 4 charge: 15.5402 magn: -0.0446 constr: 0.0000
total cpu time spent up to now is 10529.2 secs
total energy = -8411.31255477 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -8411.86059006 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 24.75641734 Ry
total magnetization = -0.20 Bohr mag/cell
absolute magnetization = 142.71 Bohr mag/cell
At this stage I terminated the program. I would expect that both total magnetization and absolute magnetization go to zero, but instead large absolute magnetizations are maintained. Although I could do the calculation without spin, I want the code to find the nonmagnetic state - so far without much luck.
Any advice would be highly appreciated!
Regards,
Jan-Albert
NOTICE: Please note that this eMail, and the contents thereof, is subject to the standard Sasol eMail legal notice which may be found at: http://www.sasol.com/legalnotices
If you cannot access the legal notice through the URL attached and you wish to receive a copy thereof please send an eMail to legalnotice at sasol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150715/869556b0/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list