[Pw_forum] Graphene Nanoribbon (Negative phonon frequencies and structure relaxation)
Ari P Seitsonen
Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi
Fri Jan 2 20:16:26 CET 2015
Dear Prabhakar,
Did you check your structure? To me it looks very weird in 'XCrysDen',
the planes of the periodic GNR's along z direction only 2 Angstroms apart.
And yes, you should relax the structure before calculating phonons. And
your system is periodic in all directions, and the GNR seems to run along
x, not y like I understood from your description below. Please also read
the instructions about 'ecutrho' when using ultra-soft pseudo potentials
or the PAW method.
Good Luck, :)
apsi
-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
Ari Paavo Seitsonen / Ari.P.Seitsonen at iki.fi / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Département de Chimie, Paris
Mobile (F) : +33 789 37 24 25 (CH) : +41 79 71 90 935
On Fri, 2 Jan 2015, Prabhakar Marepalli wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm trying to compute phonon dispersion properties of graphene nanoribbon
> using Quantum Espresso. My unit cell is a simple armchair structure with 4
> atoms per unit cell. It looks like below:
>
> 0----0
> / \
> 0 0
>
> The above structure is replicated in the y-direction (the periodic
> direction) while the x-direction is confined. Using the above structure,
> here is the outline of the problems I'm running into:
>
> 1) Negative phonon frequencies (not only at gamma point, but at all other
> k-points)
>
> 2) I tried using 'asr' but that doesn't seem to fix the problem.
>
> 3) I understand that the problem might be due to instability of the
> structure (I did notice that the forces on atoms in scf calculation is
> non-zero , forces of the magnitude 0.2 to 0.4).
>
> 4) When I try to relax the structure using 'ion_dynamics', the forces did go
> down but the structure is relaxed so much that it is no longer graphene
> nanoribbon.
>
> Can you please give me some pointers on how to approach this problem, i.e.
> how do I get rid of negative frequencies while relaxing the structure that
> constrains it to look like a nanoribbon ?
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
> Here are my input files:
>
> pw.x (this doesn't include the ion_dynamics relaxation).
>
> &control
> calculation='scf'
> restart_mode='from_scratch',
> tstress = .true.
> tprnfor = .true.
> prefix='gnr_arm',
> pseudo_dir = '/work/02420/pm24229/QE/QE/pseudo/',
> outdir = '/home1/02420/pm24229/tmp/',
> /
> &system
> ibrav= 0, nat= 4, ntyp= 1, nbnd= 20,
> ecutwfc =25.0, occupations='smearing', smearing='marzari-vanderbilt',
> degauss=0.02
> /
> &electrons
> diagonalization='cg'
> conv_thr = 1.0d-12
> mixing_beta = 0.7
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> C 12.0107 C.pbe-rrkjus.UPF
>
> CELL_PARAMETERS {angstrom}
> 2.5546 0.00000000 0.00000000
> 0.00000000 10.0 0.00000000
> 0.00000000 0.00000000 2.00000000
>
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
> C 0.0 0.0 0.0
> C 1.2773 0.7375 0.000
> C 1.2773 2.2125 0.00
> C 0.0 2.95 0.0
>
> K_POINTS automatic
> 20 1 1 1 1 1
>
> ph.x
>
> phonons on kspace
> &inputph
> tr2_ph=1.0d-14,
> prefix='gnr_arm',
> ldisp=.true.,
> nq1=20, nq2=1, nq3=1
> amass(1)=12.0107,
> outdir='/home1/02420/pm24229/tmp/',
> fildyn='gnr_dyn',
> /
>
> Thanks,
> Prabhakar Marepalli
>
>
>
>
More information about the users
mailing list