[Pw_forum] USPP + Hybrid XC in V5.1.1
Amin Torabi
mtorabi at uwo.ca
Sun Feb 22 00:06:20 CET 2015
Folks,
I've noticed that V5.1.1 does not anymore say that "hybrid XC not
implemented for USPP". I tried to test it on TiO2 (WZ), but the results are
nonsense. Am I missing something serious in my input:
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 7
A = 3.75
C = 9.518
nat = 6
ntyp = 2
nbnd = 25
ecutwfc = 60
ecutrho = 600
nqx1 = 2
nqx2 = 2
nqx3 = 2
input_dft = 'hse'
x_gamma_extrapolation = .true
/
&ELECTRONS
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
O 15.9994 O.pbe-n-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
Ti 47.8670 Ti.pbe-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
Ti 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
Ti -0.5000000 0.7500000 0.2500000
O 0.0000000 -0.2080000 -0.2080000
O 0.0000000 0.2080000 0.2080000
O -0.5000000 0.9580000 0.4580000
O -0.5000000 0.5420000 0.0420000
K_POINTS automatic
4 4 2 0 0 0
Part of the output:
k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ( 4071 PWs) bands (ev):
*********************************************-492.5825-480.8464-446.4552
-434.6093-412.5616-361.5954-254.9388-177.9391 -64.8112 -61.2709 -28.5068
-28.2682 -27.6667 -25.6141 -25.5221 -25.2514 -25.0338 -1.4354 2.3925
4.7201
--
**********************************
Amin Torabi
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Chemistry
University of Western Ontario
**********************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150221/6089a412/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list