[Pw_forum] Segmentation Fault in Subroutine divide_class.f90
Surender
surender_kumar at iitb.ac.in
Wed Dec 16 10:50:27 CET 2015
Thank you very much.
> Sorry it is the 0.866025 in cell parameters that has too few digits. It
> should be \sqrt{3}/2. 0.8660254 is sufficient in my PC to find the
> correct classes.
>
> Andrea
>
> On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 17:19 +0530, Surender wrote:
>> Dear Andrea,
>> Thank you for your reply, as per your suggestion, I tried the following
>> atomic positions
>>
>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>> Ni 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.000000
>> Ni 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.500000
>> As 0.3333333 0.6666667 0.250000
>> As 0.6666667 0.3333333 0.750000
>>
>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>> Ni 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.000000
>> Ni 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.500000
>> As 0.33333333 0.66666667 0.250000
>> As 0.66666667 0.33333333 0.750000
>>
>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>> Ni 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000
>> Ni 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.500000
>> As 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.250000
>> As 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.750000
>>
>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>> Ni 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 0.000000
>> Ni 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 0.500000
>> As 0.3333333333 0.6666666667 0.250000
>> As 0.6666666667 0.3333333333 0.750000
>>
>> But unfortunately I got the same error (for all the atomic positions),
>> did
>> I miss something?
>>
>>
>> > Please add more digits to 1/3 and 2/3.
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> >
>> > Andrea
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 16:34 +0530, Surender wrote:
>> >> Dear All,
>> >>
>> >> I am trying to run the following input file using QE-5.1.2 (compiled
>> >> with
>> >> Intel Compilers + Intel MKL + FFTW + OpenMPI) and running on Fedora
>> 17
>> >> (64-bit)
>> >>
>> >> //================================//
>> >>
>> >> &control
>> >> prefix='nias'
>> >> calculation = 'scf'
>> >> restart_mode='from_scratch'
>> >> verbosity='high'
>> >> pseudo_dir = './'
>> >> outdir='./tmp'
>> >> tprnfor=.true.
>> >> tstress=.true.
>> >> /
>> >> &system
>> >> ibrav= 0
>> >> celldm(1)=6.8067935
>> >> nat= 4
>> >> ntyp= 2
>> >> ! nosym=.true.
>> >> ecutwfc=50.0
>> >> ecutrho=500.0
>> >> occupations='smearing'
>> >> smearing='mv'
>> >> degauss=0.005
>> >> /
>> >> &electrons
>> >> mixing_beta = 0.5
>> >> conv_thr = 1.0D-08
>> >> /
>> >> ATOMIC_SPECIES
>> >> Ni 10.0 Ni.pbe-n-rrkjus_psl.0.1.UPF
>> >> As 10.0 As.pbe-n-rrkjus_psl.0.2.UPF
>> >> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>> >> Ni 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
>> >> Ni 0.000000 0.000000 0.500000
>> >> As 0.333333 0.666667 0.250000
>> >> As 0.666667 0.333333 0.750000
>> >> K_POINTS automatic
>> >> 10 10 10 1 1 1
>> >> CELL_PARAMETERS alat
>> >> 1.000000 0.000000 0.000000
>> >> -0.500000 0.866025 0.000000
>> >> 0.000000 0.000000 1.390616
>> >>
>> >> //================================//
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, QE crashes with segmentation fault in subroutine
>> >> divide_class.f90, for exact message see the attached scf.out file. I
>> >> tried
>> >> the same input file with QE-5.2.0 and QE-5.2.1 as well but received
>> the
>> >> same error. To me, it appears to be related to symmetry because if I
>> use
>> >> the flag nosym=true , pw.x works fine but takes too long to complete.
>> >> Please help.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Surender Kumar
>> >> IIT Bombay, India
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pw_forum mailing list
>> >> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> >> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>> >
>> > --
>> > Andrea Dal Corso Tel. 0039-040-3787428
>> > SISSA, Via Bonomea 265 Fax. 0039-040-3787249
>> > I-34136 Trieste (Italy) e-mail: dalcorso at sissa.it
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pw_forum mailing list
>> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
> --
> Andrea Dal Corso Tel. 0039-040-3787428
> SISSA, Via Bonomea 265 Fax. 0039-040-3787249
> I-34136 Trieste (Italy) e-mail: dalcorso at sissa.it
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
More information about the users
mailing list