[Pw_forum] Convergence of Magnetization in Graphene Monovacancy Supercell
Haricharan Padmanabhan
hari00968 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 21 10:43:01 CEST 2014
Dear Quantum ESPRESSO users,
I am attempting to estimate the value of the magnetism in Graphene with a
mono-vacancy, using supercells of different sizes.
Some background -
- One would expect (from literature) the magnetism to converge to around
1.5 bohr magnetons (uB) as the supercell size is increased.
- Since vacancies result in localized states at the Fermi level (flat
bands, or peaks in the DOS), a dense k-point mesh is usually required to
accurately estimate (N.up - N.down), and hence the magnetism.
I first obtained convergence with respect to k-point sampling, for a 4x4
supercell (31 atoms + 1 vacancy)
K-point mesh Total Energy (Ry)
Total magnetization (uB)
16x16 -355.586 1.29
20x20 -355.586 1.21
24x24 -355.586 1.25
32x32 -355.586 1.27
36x36 -355.586 1.27
A larger 6x6 supercell (71 atoms + 1 vacancy), by conventional wisdom,
would require a less dense k-point mesh for convergence. However, even with
a dense 32x32 k-point mesh, I get a non-converged value of 0.59 uB for the
magnetism. Different calculations with different k-point meshes give me
values that oscillate between 0.59 and 1.45 uB, with no apparent pattern.
It does not make sense to me to further increase the k-point mesh density.
Clearly, the flat bands at the Fermi level are causing trouble depending on
whether they've been bumped slightly above or below the Fermi level, due to
inadequate k-point sampling in different calculations. How can I fix this
problem? Will doing a manual k-point sampling help?
A part of the input file -
&system
ibrav= 4, celldm(1) =27.9, celldm(3) = 1, nat= 71, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =30.0,
ecutrho = 250.0,
occupations='smearing', smearing='gaussian', degauss=0.001
nspin = 2, starting_magnetization(1)=0.7
/
&electrons
diagonalization='cg'
mixing_mode = 'plain'
mixing_beta = 0.1
conv_thr = 1.0d-6
electron_maxstep = 200
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.011 c_pbe_v1.2.uspp.F.UPF
K_POINTS {automatic}
32 32 1 0 0 0
A part of the output file -
the Fermi energy is -1.9682 ev
total energy = -815.17816366 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -815.17815922 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000077 Ry
The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = -5427.83442348 Ry
hartree contribution = 2763.25828072 Ry
xc contribution = -257.55564014 Ry
ewald contribution = 2106.95386447 Ry
smearing contrib. (-TS) = -0.00024524 Ry
total magnetization = 0.59 Bohr mag/cell
absolute magnetization = 0.79 Bohr mag/cell
Thank you.
Haricharan Padmanabhan
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141021/f8246c69/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list