[Pw_forum] vdw correction for Bi-layer grahene
plgong
plgong at theory.issp.ac.cn
Sat Oct 18 09:16:57 CEST 2014
Dear Paolo Giannozzi,
Thanks for your reply and useful files. I have used 'vdw-df' to correct to PBE functional in bilayer graphene, and get
good results (3.40 angstrom). Some tips should be noted. One should not provide a primitive structure with large deviation
from equilibrium, e.g, 5.0 angstorm for layer-distance is bad guess. On the other hand, I think of 'vdw-df' as a correction
for LDA meaningless although it gives somelike results. Because this kind of correction is added for GGA.
So, I want to konw whether my second opition is right? BTW, I also donnot understand why you set 'input_dft='Pz' but with
PBE fubction.
Best wishes
P. L. Gong
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Paolo Giannozzi" <paolo.giannozzi at uniud.it>
> 发送时间: 2014年10月17日 星期五
> 收件人: "PWSCF Forum" <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: [Pw_forum] vdw correction for Bi-layer grahene
>
> Please see some slides and an example (graphite) here:
> http://www.fisica.uniud.it/~giannozz/Public/vdw.tar.gz
> P.
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 18:56 +0800, plgong wrote:
> > Dear pwscf user,
> > Recently, I calculated Bilayer graphene with vdw correction. In version of 4.3, the parameter of London can be set to 'true'
> > and then add vdw correction to Exc. In version of 5.1, more options can do it, such as, 'grimmer-d2', 'dft-d'. However, many tests have been performed but I cannot get the layer-distance (3.34 angstrom in experiment). I uesd GGA-PBE and LDA-PZ with vdw, recepetively. The final results shows small distance (3.0 angstrom). I donnot know why leads to the small distance. So, I still tested the Ecut (30Ry-60Ry0) and vaccum (10-20 angstrom), but the problem was the same.
> > The input file is,
> >
> > &CONTROL
> > calculation = 'relax' ,
> > outdir ='./tmp' ,
> > restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> > pseudo_dir ='/home/plgong/pseudo',
> > etot_conv_thr = 1.0e-4 ,
> > forc_conv_thr = 1.0e-3 ,
> > prefix='graphene',
> > /
> > &SYSTEM
> > ibrav = 4,
> > a =2.46
> > c =10.0
> > nat = 4,
> > ntyp = 1,
> > ecutwfc = 30.D0 ,
> > ecutrho = 240.0 ,
> > vdw_corr='grimme-d2'
> > tot_charge = 0.00,
> > occupations = 'smearing' ,
> > degauss = 0.02 ,
> > smearing='mv'
> >
> > /
> > &ELECTRONS
> > conv_thr = 1.D-7 ,
> > mixing_beta=0.3
> > mixing_mode='local-TF'
> > electron_maxstep=300
> > /
> > &IONS
> > ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> >
> > /
> > ATOMIC_SPECIES
> > C 12.00000 C.pz-rrkjus.UPF
> > ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
> > C 0.000000 0.000000 0.500000
> > C 0.333333 0.666667 0.500000
> > C 0.000000 0.000000 0.834000
> > C 0.666667 0.333333 0.834000
> > K_POINTS {automatic}
> > 30 30 1 0 0 0
> >
> > Can anyone help me to solve it?
> >
> > P. L. Gong
> > ISSP CAS, HeFei, China
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ====================================================
> > Addr: Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of
> > Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
> > Tel: +86-551-65591591(office), 18756086113(cell phone)
> > Email: plgong at theory.issp.ac.cn
> > ========================================================================
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
> --
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dept. Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
--
====================================================
Addr: Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
Tel: +86-551-65591591(office), 18756086113(cell phone)
Email: plgong at theory.issp.ac.cn
========================================================================
More information about the users
mailing list