[Pw_forum] Different convergence behavior in non-collinear SO calculation
H. Lee
hjunlee at gmail.com
Fri Oct 10 11:42:39 CEST 2014
Dear Prof. Paolo Giannozzi:
Thanks for your reply.
But, according to the change of number of pools, I also changed the number
of cores; therefore, plane waves, fft grid, etc. are distributed equally in
both cases. Also, each diagonalization is carried out within the same
number of cores.
At SCF step, most relevant values over k points are merged by use of
mp_sum, mp_max, etc.
At least to me, this difference seems strange.
Regards.
H. Lee
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Paolo Giannozzi <paolo.giannozzi at uniud.it>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 20:29 +0200, H. Lee wrote:
>
> > Is this just an inevitable numerical noise?
>
> very likely. Some numerical noise is always there, it
> is usually almost invisible, especially at scf convergence.
> In some known cases of special sensitivity to truncation
> and roundoff errors: noncolinear, spin-orbit, DFT+U, it
> is more visible while self-consistency is reached. No
> easy solution is known (to me at least)
>
>
> P.
>
> --
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dept. Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141010/4ca29be3/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list