[Pw_forum] Problem about occupation number in elph calculation
Paolo Giannozzi
paolo.giannozzi at uniud.it
Sun Jun 29 10:51:33 CEST 2014
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:05 -0800, flying_lw at yeah.net wrote:
> While you say the occupation numbers are not actually used, do you
> mean that they have no effect to the integrated electron phonon
> coupling coefficient? Or you mean the contribution from the k points
> that show "NAN" occupation numbers are not counted for the integration
> over reciprocal space?
the latter you said.
> Our Tc for MgB2 is much lower than experiment and previous QE results.
> We wonder whether the NAN error for occupation number is part of the
> reason.
unlikely. Once again: electron-phonon coefficients calculations are
tricky
P.
>
> Thank you again for the help.
>
>
> Wei Liu
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> flying_lw at yeah.net
>
> From: Paolo Giannozzi
> Date: 2014-06-25 03:20
> To: PWSCF Forum
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Problem about occupation number in
> elph calculation
> I don't think that those occupation numbers are actually used.
> If they are, you get NaN everywhere
>
> P.
>
> On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 10:10 -0800, flying_lw at yeah.net wrote:
> > Dear Quantum Espresso users,
> >
> >
> > I am using QE v 5.0.2 to calculate the Tc of MgB2. The job
> is done
> > normally, but I got one problem when I cheked the output
> > file mgb2.elph.out. The occupation numbers of some k points
> are 'NaN'.
> > I did the same job using QE v 5.1, all the 'NaN' become
> '0.0000'. I'm
> > not sure what is happening. Will this cause something wrong
> in the
> > final results?
> >
> >
> > Part of the output file is as below:
> >
> >
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> > End of band structure calculation
> >
> > k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 band energies (ev):
> >
> > -33.3325 -33.3325 -33.3154 -3.7339 5.7105 9.0432 9.0432
> 10.2941
> > 15.0631 15.0631 16.8819
> >
> > occupation numbers
> > 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0368 0.0368 -0.0001
> > -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0000
> >
> > k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.1089 band energies (ev):
> >
> > -33.3324 -33.3324 -33.3165 -3.5997 4.7550 9.0927 9.0927
> 11.5641
> > 15.1063 15.1063 16.8566
> >
> > occupation numbers
> > NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> > NaN NaN NaN
> >
> > k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0363 band energies (ev):
> >
> > -33.3325 -33.3325 -33.3155 -3.7188 5.5783 9.0489 9.0489
> 10.4614
> > 15.0681 15.0681 16.8790
> >
> > occupation numbers
> > 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0333 0.0333 -0.0000
> > -0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0000
> >
> > k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.1451 band energies (ev):
> >
> > -33.3324 -33.3324 -33.3172 -3.4981 4.2250 9.1283 9.1283
> 12.3377
> > 15.1375 15.1375 16.8387
> >
> > occupation numbers
> > NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
> > NaN NaN NaN
> >
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have attached the input and output files. Thank you for
> your help.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
> --
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dept. Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
More information about the users
mailing list