[Pw_forum] Transmission from PWCOND
Sclauzero Gabriele
gabriele.sclauzero at mat.ethz.ch
Wed Jun 18 18:04:11 CEST 2014
Dear Vladislav,
I think there was an erroneous extra factor 2 in some PWcond versions between 5.0 and 5.0.2. I would stick to the latest stable version 5.1, recently released.
Best regards,
GS
> I calculate the spin-polarized transmission for a tunnel junction
> using the PWCOND code. The calculation is performed for each k-point
> in the irreducible part of the Brillouin Zone separately.
> At the end of each output file one sees the contributions to the
> transmission from different propagating states (an example is shown
> below for the 5.0.1 version of the code).
>
> ************************************************************
> The input for PWCOND:
>
> &inputcond
> outdir = '/scratch/vborisov/tmp/test/',
> prefixl = 'lead',
> prefixs = 'scat',
> tran_file = 'T-k1.Ef'
> ikind = 1,
> iofspin = 1,
> energy0 = 0.00d0,
> denergy = -0.01d0,
> ewind = 2.d0,
> epsproj = 1.d-7,
> delgep = 1.d-7,
> cutplot = 3.d0,
> nz1 = 22,
> bds = 9.667070904
> /
> 1
> 0.00347222 0.00694445 1
> 1
>
>
> A part of the output:
>
> --- E-Ef = 0.0000000 k = 0.0034722 0.0069444
> --- ie = 1 ik = 1
> Nchannels of the left tip = 1
> Right moving states:
> k1(2pi/a) k2(2pi/a) E-Ef (eV)
> -0.3924556 0.0000000 0.0000000
> Left moving states:
> k1(2pi/a) k2(2pi/a) E-Ef (eV)
> 0.3924556 0.0000000 0.0000000
>
> to transmit
> Band j to band i transmissions and reflections:
> j i |T_ij|^2 |R_ij|^2
>
> 1 --> 1 0.00014 0.99986
> Total T_j, R_j = 0.00014 0.99986
>
> E-Ef(ev), T = 0.0000000 0.0001402
> Eigenchannel decomposition:
> # 1 0.00000 0.00014
> 1.00000
> T_tot 0.00000 0.28041E-03
>
> ************************************************************
>
> From this output, one would conclude that the transmission for
> this k-point equals 0.1402E-03. However, after this result comes
> also the eigenchannel decomposition and the T_tot value, which
> is twice as large and equals 0.28041E-03. The same behavior is
> observed for every other k-point. However, this discrepancy
> does not appear for the CVS version of the code.
>
> Where does this factor of 2 come from in the older version?
> Do the values of T_tot in these two versions always differ
> by the same factor of 2?
>
> I would very much appreciate any assistance with this problem.
>
>
> With kind regards,
> Vladislav Borisov
>
> Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics
> Weinberg 2, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany
> Tel No: +49 345 5525448
> Fax No: +49 345 5525446
> Email: vborisov at mpi-halle.mpg.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
Dr. Gabriele Sclauzero
Materials Theory - ETHZ
ETH Zurich, HIT G 43.2
Wolfgang-Pauli-Str. 27
8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Phone +41 44 633 94 10
Fax +41 44 633 14 59
gabriele.sclauzero at mat.ethz.ch
www.theory.mat.ethz.ch
More information about the users
mailing list