[Pw_forum] accuracy of stress determination of vc-relax
Uri Argaman
argamanu at post.bgu.ac.il
Thu Dec 11 07:52:59 CET 2014
Dear QE users and developers
I do vc-relax with BFGS algorithm as follows:
&CONTROL
calculation = "vc-relax",
pseudo_dir = '/home/uriargaman/espresso-5.0.3/pseudo/',
outdir = '/home/uriargaman/tmp/tmp28898/',
tstress=.true.
verbosity='high',
/
&system
ibrav= 4, celldm(1) =5.548454954360, celldm(3) =1.581979631777413 ,
nat= 2, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =80, ecutrho=1200,
occupations='smearing', smearing="methfessel-paxton", degauss=0.01,
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 1.D-9,
electron_maxstep=1000
mixing_beta = 0.7D0,
/
&IONS
ion_dynamics="bfgs",
/
&cell
cell_dynamics="bfgs",
press=0.6,
press_conv_thr=0.01,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Ti 47.9 Ti.pbe-sp-van_ak.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Ti 0.666666666 0.333333333 0.250000000 0 0 0
Ti 0.333333333 0.666666666 0.750000000
K_POINTS {automatic}
24 24 24 0 0 0
In the last iteration (after begin final coordinates) I got stress:
total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P=
0.71
0.00000485 -0.00000000 -0.00000000 0.71 -0.00 -0.00
-0.00000000 0.00000485 0.00000000 -0.00 0.71 0.00
-0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000481 -0.00 0.00 0.71
and the stress in the iteration before (last iteration before begin final
coordinates):
total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P= 0.73
0.00000499 -0.00000000 0.00000000 0.73 -0.00 0.00
-0.00000000 0.00000499 0.00000000 -0.00 0.73 0.00
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000495 0.00 0.00 0.73
I did'nt reach the pressure threshold although I have very good convergence
with respect to all numerical parameters. The threshold is achieved only
for hydrostatic condition but not for the value of the stress (P=0.73 kbar
instead of 0.6 kbar). Is the parameter "press_conv_thr" is just for the
hydrostatic condition and not for the absolute value of the stress? How can
I get more accurate stress?
Thank you very much
Uri Argaman
Ben-Gurion University
Israel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141211/cb208543/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list