[Pw_forum] Crystal Structures in QE
Paolo Giannozzi
paolo.giannozzi at uniud.it
Sat Aug 30 12:03:21 CEST 2014
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 03:33 -0400, Cameron Foss wrote:
> Are the K_POINTS in the scf calculation for pw.x responsible for
> specifying some relevant shape? (eg 4 4 4 or 8 8 8 = bulk material,
> and 4 4 1 or 8 8 2 = thin film/2D structure)
I would say that it is the other way round: the shape of the cell
determines the k-point grid
P.
>
>
> To put this in context, I am trying to measure the effects of Strain
> on phonons and crystal structure of thin films of silicon stretched
> over some SiGe Alloy or Ge substrate. The result being a stretched
> layer of silicon over the substrate which is stretched in the 100 and
> 010 directions, and negligibly compressed in the 001 direction. It is
> important that the structure does not relax at all in the calculation
> for this would give misleading results.
>
>
> Thus far i have been using K_POINTS such as 4 4 4 or 8 8 8, and am
> curious to know if these K_POINTS are meant for specifying bulk
> materials, and if I should change to something more like 4 4 1 or 8 8
> 2 for thin filmed structures?
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Cameron
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
More information about the users
mailing list