[Pw_forum] convergence is not achieved, please help!!!
Giuseppe Mattioli
giuseppe.mattioli at ism.cnr.it
Fri Nov 29 19:37:56 CET 2013
Dear Ganjar
> About the parameter of pseudopotential, Prevously I have calculate
> LiFeSiO4 with the same parameters that I use here and the
> calculation is succesfull. But I dont know why for this case is not.
This is very strange... You are using norm conserving pseudopotentials
(mt indicates a Martins-Troullier norm conserving pseudopotential)
which should be quite hard. They should require (at least) ecutwfc >=
100, but you should check the convergence wrt ecutwfc, and I would not
be surprised by a final ecutwfc=140~150.
HTH
Giuseppe
Giuseppe Mattioli
ISM-CNR
Italy
Quoting Ganjar Kurniawan <zargan88 at yahoo.com>:
> Thanks for the suggestions.....
> I have checked the structure using Xcrysden and then compared with
> the literature. I find that there is no problem with the structure,
> so I`m sure that the it is right.
> About the parameter of pseudopotential, Prevously I have calculate
> LiFeSiO4 with the same parameters that I use here and the
> calculation is succesfull. But I dont know why for this case is not.
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, 29 November 2013 4:46 PM, Vikan Manmathan
> <vikanmanmathan1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Ganjar Kurniawan,
> Read the input structure first.
> http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/Doc/INPUT_PW.html#id3119661
> Try to visualize the structure before running the calculations,
> using some graphical software like Xcrysden.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Axel Kohlmeyer <akohlmey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Ganjar Kurniawan <zargan88 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Dear QE user...
>>> I`m trying to optimize geometry of Li2FeSiO4 structure using 'relax', but
>>> the result said that the " convergence NOT achieved after 100 iterations:
>>> stopping ". I have used the atomic position from the literature.
>>> here it is the input that i use
>>
>> hmm... you seem to be using norm-conserving pseudopotentials, but use
>> wavefunction/density cutoff values that are commonly used for
>> ultra-soft pseudo-potentials. is there are specific reason for this?
>>
>> axel.
>>
>>
>>
>>> &CONTROL
>>> calculation = 'relax',
>>> restart_mode = 'from_scratch',
>>> nstep = 50
>>> outdir = '/home/ganjar/Li2FeSiO4/pmn21/normal/relax'
>>> pseudo_dir = '/share/apps/espresso-5.0.2/pseudo',
>>> prefix='files_lar'
>>> tprnfor = .true.
>>> tstress = .true.
>>> etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-4, forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-2
>>> /
>>> &SYSTEM
>>> ibrav=0, a = 6.3219, b = 5.3935, c = 4.9939, cosAB = 0, cosAC = 0, cosBC =
>>> 0, nat = 16, ntyp = 4, ecutwfc = 30, ecutrho = 240,
>>> occupations = 'smearing', smearing='marzari-vanderbilt', degauss= 0.015,
>>> nspin=1
>>> /
>>> &ELECTRONS
>>>
>>> conv_thr = 1.0D-8
>>> diagonalization = 'david', mixing_beta = 0.7, startingpot = 'atomic',
>>> startingwfc = 'random', tqr = .true.
>>> /
>>> &IONS
>>> ion_dynamics = 'bfgs'
>>> /
>>> ATOMIC_SPECIES
>>> Li 6.9410 Li.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
>>> Fe 55.847 Fe.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
>>> Si 28.085 Si.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
>>> O 15.999 O.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
>>> CELL_PARAMETERS alat
>>>
>>> 1.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 1.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 1.000
>>>
>>> ATOMIC_POSITIONS alat
>>>
>>> Li 0.2498 0.3307 0.8023
>>> Li 0.2501 0.6693 0.3023
>>> Li 0.7498 0.6693 0.3023
>>> Li 0.7501 0.3307 0.8023
>>> Fe 0.5000 0.8261 0.7960
>>> Fe 0.0000 0.1738 0.2960
>>> Si 0.0000 0.8297 0.8112
>>> Si 0.5000 0.1702 0.3112
>>> O 0.2145 0.6849 0.7013
>>> O 0.2854 0.3150 0.2013
>>> O 0.7145 0.3150 0.2013
>>> O 0.7854 0.6849 0.7013
>>> O 0.0000 0.1231 0.7118
>>> O 0.5000 0.8768 0.2118
>>> O 0.5000 0.1794 0.6417
>>> O 0.0000 0.8205 0.1417
>>>
>>> K_POINTS automatic
>>> 2 4 4 0 0 0
>>>
>>> what wrong with my input???
>>> anybody can correct it??
>>>
>>> Best regard
>>> Ganjar Kurniawan
>>> Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pw_forum mailing list
>>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey at gmail.com http://goo.gl/1wk0
>> International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste. Italy.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>
>
> --
>
> NANDHA KUMAR V.
> Research scholar,
>
> IISER, PUNE.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
--
********************************************************
- Article premier - Les hommes naissent et demeurent
libres et ègaux en droits. Les distinctions sociales
ne peuvent être fondèes que sur l'utilitè commune
- Article 2 - Le but de toute association politique
est la conservation des droits naturels et
imprescriptibles de l'homme. Ces droits sont la libertè,
la propriètè, la sùretè et la rèsistance à l'oppression.
********************************************************
Giuseppe Mattioli
CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
v. Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
I 00015 - Monterotondo Stazione (RM)
Tel + 39 06 90672836 - Fax +39 06 90672316
E-mail: <giuseppe.mattioli at ism.cnr.it>
More information about the users
mailing list