[Pw_forum] Question on spin-polarized calculation

Marcos Veríssimo Alves marcos.verissimo.alves at gmail.com
Thu Nov 7 11:10:29 CET 2013


Indeed... I hadn't realized it. Thanks, Giuseppe.

M

---

Prof. Dr. Marcos Verissimo Alves
Prof. Adjunto I, Curso de Física Computacional
Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Polo Universitário de Volta Redonda
Universidade Federal Fluminense
Volta Redonda - RJ, Brasil


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Giuseppe Mattioli <
giuseppe.mattioli at ism.cnr.it> wrote:

>
> Dear Marcos
> You are already breaking the symmetry of your system by creating a vacancy
> and by indicating different starting magnetizations on the C1, C2 and C3
> atoms. The C4 atoms should be therefore free to find their preferred spin
> state. However, to be sure, launch the job and check that it contains the
> statement
>
>      No symmetry found
>
> HTH
>
> Giuseppe
>
> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 23:39:55 Marcos Veríssimo Alves wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a supercell for a honeycomb lattice with a vacancy for which I
> would
> > like to perform spin-polarized calculations. The three nearest-neighbors
> of
> > the atom that was removed to create the vacancy belong to the same
> > sub-lattice, but I would like to have one of them start with spin up and
> > the other two spin down, and see what the final state of the system will
> > be. I would like to allow for the remaining atoms to end with whichever
> > spin, up or down, the SCF process determines to be the most favorable.
> >
> > Would it be enough to give these three atoms different labels, and the
> same
> > label for all the rest of the atoms? For example, suppose I called the
> > three atoms surrounding the vacancy C1, C2 and C3, and the remaining
> atoms
> > (next-nearest-neighbors of the atom removed, and beyond) simply C4. Would
> > this allow the remaining atoms to end with whatever spin orientation is
> > more favorable, or would there be some symmetry restriction that would
> not
> > allow, for example, a ferrimagnetic state with such labeling?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Marcos Verissimo Alves
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Prof. Dr. Marcos Verissimo Alves
> > Prof. Adjunto I, Curso de Física Computacional
> > Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Polo Universitário de Volta Redonda
> > Universidade Federal Fluminense
> > Volta Redonda - RJ, Brasil
>
>
> ********************************************************
> - Article premier - Les hommes naissent et demeurent
> libres et ègaux en droits. Les distinctions sociales
> ne peuvent être fondèes que sur l'utilitè commune
> - Article 2 - Le but de toute association politique
> est la conservation des droits naturels et
> imprescriptibles de l'homme. Ces droits sont la libertè,
> la propriètè, la sùretè et la rèsistance à l'oppression.
> ********************************************************
>
>    Giuseppe Mattioli
>    CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
>    v. Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
>    I 00015 - Monterotondo Stazione (RM)
>    Tel + 39 06 90672836 - Fax +39 06 90672316
>    E-mail: <giuseppe.mattioli at ism.cnr.it>
>    ResearcherID: F-6308-2012
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131107/7fd0c4aa/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list