[Pw_forum] ph.x: Wrong classes for C_3v
David Strubbe
dstrubbe at berkeley.edu
Thu Jan 17 20:38:23 CET 2013
Andrea and Giovanni,
Thank you for your comments. Yes, it was a mistake to have this subtle
difference between the lattice vectors. I changed them to be identical:
CELL_PARAMETERS
5.42763 0.0 0.0
0.0 5.42763 0.0
0.0 0.0 5.42763
Now pw.x can run in high verbosity without crashing, and the phonon run
proceeds, but there is clearly still a symmetry problem as it gives '?' for
many of the modes in the symmetry analysis.
Mode symmetry, C_3v (3m) point group:
omega( 1 - 1) = -336.3 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 2 - 2) = -336.3 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 3 - 3) = -336.3 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 4 - 4) = -336.3 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 5 - 5) = -336.3 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 6 - 6) = -336.3 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 7 - 7) = 26.1 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 8 - 8) = 26.2 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 9 - 9) = 26.2 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 10 - 10) = 286.6 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 11 - 11) = 286.6 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 12 - 12) = 287.0 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 13 - 13) = 287.1 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 14 - 14) = 287.5 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 15 - 15) = 288.1 [cm-1] --> ?
omega( 16 - 16) = 413.2 [cm-1] --> A_1 L_1 I+R
omega( 17 - 17) = 413.2 [cm-1] --> A_2 L_2
omega( 18 - 19) = 413.2 [cm-1] --> E L_3 I+R
omega( 20 - 21) = 413.3 [cm-1] --> E L_3 I+R
omega( 22 - 22) = 583.3 [cm-1] --> A_1 L_1 I+R
omega( 23 - 24) = 583.3 [cm-1] --> E L_3 I+R
David Strubbe
MIT
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Dal Corso Andrea <dalcorso at sissa.it> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 18:10 -0500, David Strubbe wrote:
> > Dear QE developers,
> >
> >
> > I have encountered an internal error regarding symmetry with QE 5.0.2,
> > for a calculation with 8 atoms of Si. The scf calculation with pw.x
> > runs fine, but then ph.x crashes immediately with the following
> > message. This happened in serial and parallel with ifort, as well as
> > in serial with gfortran. Input files scf.in and ph.in are below also.
> > I tried with the patch to 5.0.3 emailed out by Dr. Gianozzi a few
> > weeks, and got the same error.
> >
> >
> > David Strubbe
> > MIT
> >
> >
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> > %%%%%%%%%
> > Error in routine divide_class (1):
> > Wrong classes for C_3v
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> > %%%%%%%%%
> >
> >
> > $ cat scf.in
> > &control
> > prefix = 'silicon'
> > calculation = 'scf'
> > restart_mode = 'from_scratch'
> > pseudo_dir = '/home/dstrubbe/raman_Si/pseudo'
> > /
> > &system
> > ibrav = 0
> > celldm(1) = 1.88972613
> > nat = 8
> > ntyp = 1
> > nbnd = 32
> > ecutwfc = 50.0
> > /
> > &electrons
> > /
> > CELL_PARAMETERS
> > 5.427632 0.0 0.0
> > 0.0 5.42763 0.0
> > 0.0 0.0 5.42763
>
>
> This is a well known problem. pw.x finds more symmetries than the
> routines that analyze the point group. This happens because the
> difference between 5.427632 and 5.42763 is too small and pw.x finds
> symmetries that are not there. If this is a mistake in your input than
> please correct it an use three equal values, if instead this is really
> what you want, than the threshold for comparing symmetries (accept
> parameter in symm_base module) should be decreased, otherwise pw.x
> ignore the difference in any case.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
>
> > ATOMIC_SPECIES
> > Si 28.086 Si.UPF
> > ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
> > Si 0.542763 0.542763 0.542763
> > Si 3.256579 3.256579 0.542763
> > Si 0.542763 3.256579 3.256579
> > Si 3.256579 0.542763 3.256579
> > Si 1.899671 1.899671 1.899671
> > Si 4.613487 4.613487 1.899671
> > Si 1.899671 4.613487 4.613487
> > Si 4.613487 1.899671 4.613487
> > K_POINTS automatic
> > 1 1 1 0 0 0
> >
> >
> > $ cat ph.in
> > phonons of Si at Gamma
> > &inputph
> > tr2_ph=1.0d-12,
> > prefix='silicon',
> > epsil=.true.,
> > trans=.true.,
> > amass(1)=28.0855,
> > /
> > 0.0 0.0 0.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130117/da1d0c8c/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list