[Pw_forum] Order of Total Energy in SCF calculations
Lorenzo Paulatto
lorenzo.paulatto at impmc.upmc.fr
Fri Dec 20 10:06:08 CET 2013
On 12/20/2013 02:54 AM, Manu Hegde wrote:
> ! total energy = 4948.67653659 Ry
> Harris-Foulkes estimate = 4948.67653659 Ry
> estimated scf accuracy < 2.7E-14 Ry
>
> The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
>
> one-electron contribution = -418.28824981 Ry
> hartree contribution = 172.04233534 Ry
> xc contribution = -53.20237765 Ry
> ewald contribution = 5304.14344253 Ry
> one-center paw contrib. = -56.01162391 Ry
> smearing contrib. (-TS) = -0.00698992 Ry
You have a very high repulsive Ewald (i.e. Ion-Ion) contribution. This
may be a problem with the pseudopotential or may very well be normal. I
remind you that absolute energies have no meaning in periodic boundary
conditions. You should compute the binding energy of this compound
w.r.t. its elements (i.e. 3x O2 molecule + 1/2 Gallium unit cell)
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Ga 31.00000 Ga.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
> O 8.00000 O.pbe-kjpaw.UPF
Just to point out that 31 and 8 are not the atomic masses of Gallium and
Oxygen, they are their atomic numbers. This won't make a difference
unless you compute phonons or simulate molecular dynamics
cheers
--
Dr. Lorenzo Paulatto
IdR @ IMPMC -- CNRS & Université Paris 6
phone:+33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz
www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
mail: 23-24/4é16 Boîte courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cédex 5
More information about the users
mailing list