[Pw_forum] cartesian (angstrom) to alat units
Gisela Bocan
gbocan at gmail.com
Thu Oct 25 21:31:49 CEST 2012
Hi,
If I am not mistaken, every coordinate should be in celldm(1) units.
celldm(1) should be in bohr, so, if you have a coordinate X in Ang you
should write X_bohr/celldm(1) (where X_bohr is X converted to bohr).
Hope it helps!
Bye!
Gisela.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Bodiford, Nelli K <
nelli.bodiford at mavs.uta.edu> wrote:
> Celldm should be in Bohr, that's what I have been using and it works.
> Hope it helps!
>
>
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:54 PM, David Furman wrote:
>
> Dear Espresso fans,****
> ** **
> I would like to make a series of calculations in different lattice
> parameter values.****
> If I understand correctly, the atomic positions should be in units of the
> lattice parameter "a" (default) in order for them to stay the same for
> every lattice parameter.****
> ****
> So, I assume each Cartesian coordinate in Ang should be a fraction of
> lattice parameter: X/a****
> But, does the lattice parameter should be in bohr (like in celldm(1)) or
> in Ang as well ?****
> ** **
> Thank you****
> * *
> * *
> ** **
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121025/26c99c3d/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list