[Pw_forum] Charge Density of Each State
Guido Fratesi
fratesi at mater.unimib.it
Thu Jun 28 11:19:54 CEST 2012
BTW, your cutoffs are larger than what I would have expected. Are you
sure you really need them to converge your calculations?
Guido
On 06/28/2012 12:19 AM, Gulcin Kucukdalyan wrote:
> Below is my input and output file:
>
> INpiut:
>
> # self-consistent calculation
> cat > gli.scf.in <http://gli.scf.in> << EOF
> &control
> calculation = 'scf'
> restart_mode='from_scratch',
> prefix='gli',
> pseudo_dir = '$PSEUDO_DIR/',
> outdir='$TMP_DIR/'
> /
> &system
> ibrav= 4, celldm(1) =8.0777, celldm(3)=0.83305, nat= 7, ntyp= 2,
> ecutwfc =60.0,
> ecutrho = 500.0
> occupations='smearing', smearing='methfessel-paxton', degauss=0.02
> /
> &electrons
> mixing_mode = 'plain'
> mixing_beta = 0.7
> conv_thr = 1.0d-7
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> C 12.0107 C.pz-rrkjus.UPF
> Li 6.9142 Li.pz-n-vbc.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS
> C -0.000169177 -0.000292351 0.000000000
> C 0.333413183 -0.000292351 0.000000000
> C 0.500204479 0.288597992 0.000000000
> C 0.333413183 0.577488334 0.000000000
> C -0.000169177 0.577488334 0.000000000
> C -0.166960373 0.288597992 0.000000000
> Li 0.166621953 0.288597992 0.416524683
> K_POINTS AUTOMATIC
> 5 5 6 0 0 0
> EOF
--
Guido Fratesi
Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali
Universita` degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
via Cozzi 53, 20125 Milano, Italy
More information about the users
mailing list