[Pw_forum] Pw_forum Digest, Vol 60, Issue 19. Re:Cystal optimisation
Davide Tiana
d.tiana at bath.ac.uk
Wed Jun 13 10:42:33 CEST 2012
Thinking you are using QE,
it could be because 200 atoms is quite big system and you are using a
small machine.
how many optimisation step do your calculation perform? In what
machine are you running the calculation? have you optimise the
parallelisation?
Quoting pw_forum-request at pwscf.org:
> Send Pw_forum mailing list submissions to
> pw_forum at pwscf.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pw_forum-request at pwscf.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pw_forum-owner at pwscf.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pw_forum digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. CRYSTAl optimization (MARTA FERRARO)
> 2. Re: CRYSTAl optimization (Paolo Giannozzi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:04:36 -0300
> From: MARTA FERRARO <ferraro at df.uba.ar>
> Subject: [Pw_forum] CRYSTAl optimization
> To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
> Message-ID:
> <CA+6AYfbDpBPG0v0z14h2yA9hRL315Cp3jJxSbt3E5DiYGY7g5w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Dear all
> I have problems to optimise a CRYSTAl Structure with 220 atoms in the
> conventional cell. The job never ends employing the default values for the
> convergence parameter in energy and force. We couldnt find the stationary
> point with 220 atoms,
> We reached the stationary point for systems with a lower number of atoms
> in the conventional cell.
>
> We tried to change the default values for the energy convergence and force
> parameters. The output file showed that the new parameters were read, but
> the calculation was not afected at all.
>
> Is there a receipt not included in the guide, to change the default values
> efficientely,
>
> Thanks a lot
> MARTA
>
> --
> Professor
> Marta Ferraro
> Physics Department
> FCE. y N, Universidad de Buenos Aires
> (1428)Ciudad Universitaria-Pab. I
> www.df.uba.ar/users/ferraro
> e-mail:ferraro at df.uba.ar
> subscribe ATMOL (LISTA DE LA DIVISION FISICA ATOMICA Y MOLECULAR)
> http://www.df.uba.ar/mailman/listinfo/atmol
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120612/f939de73/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:43:25 +0200
> From: Paolo Giannozzi <giannozz at democritos.it>
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] CRYSTAl optimization
> To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Message-ID: <96EED408-0D27-436B-AE33-3BEF8821B094 at democritos.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> On Jun 12, 2012, at 19:04 , MARTA FERRARO wrote:
>
>> I have problems to optimise a CRYSTAL Structure with 220 atoms
>
> optimise with what code? CRYSTAL?
>
> P.
> ---
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
> End of Pw_forum Digest, Vol 60, Issue 19
> ****************************************
More information about the users
mailing list