[Pw_forum] I/O performance on BG/P systems
Paolo Giannozzi
giannozz at democritos.it
Wed Mar 30 11:09:15 CEST 2011
On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:49 , Gabriele Sclauzero wrote:
> Are you referring to the wf_collect feature?
yes
> I've not been using that, so I was supposing that each process
> writes independently its piece of wavefunctions (at least for PWscf),
> am I right?
you are
> Do you think that this might be a symptom of a GPFS problem or
> misconfiguration?
not sure
> I've tried to used disk_io='low' in some relax calculations, this
> might
> be a good compromise.
as long as you have sufficient memory to keep wavefunctions into RAM,
this is the best solution
> However the code writes the wavefunctions only once at the end of
> the run.
> Wouldn't it be more reasonable to write them at the end of each
> ionic step?gh
> (just a personal opinion...)
it is not always possible to listen to all opinions...this behavior
is easy to
change, though: look for io_level in PW/electrons.f90
P.
---
Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
More information about the users
mailing list