[Pw_forum] Problems with vc-relaxed calculation
WANG Wei
wonvein at gmail.com
Fri Jul 1 18:55:09 CEST 2011
Vikas, I mean that the values of the the last-step (scf) calculation are
significantly different from those of second-step calculation (vc-relax)
from bottom. Thank you!
&control
calculation = 'vc-relax'
! restart_mode='from_scratch',
prefix='graphite',
tstress = .true.
tprnfor = .true.
pseudo_dir = "/home/wangvei/works/quantum-espresso/pseudo",
outdir = "./",
disk_io = 'none'
forc_conv_thr = 1.0e-3
/
&system
ibrav = 4
celldm(1) = 4.68
celldm(3) = 2.70
nat = 4
ntyp = 1
occupations = "smearing",
smearing = "gaussian",
degauss = 0.002D0,
ecutwfc = 40.0
ecutrho = 200
! input_dft = 'vdw1'
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-8
/
&ions
/
&cell
press_conv_thr = 0.5D0
press = 0.D0
cell_dynamics = 'bfgs'
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.00 C.pbe-paw_kj.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
C 0.00000 0.00000 0.25000
C 0.00000 0.00000 0.75000
C 0.33333 0.66667 0.25000
C 0.66667 0.33333 0.75000
K_POINTS automatic
9 9 4 0 0 0
On 2 July 2011 01:43, Vikas Varshney <vv0210 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you update the cell dimensions correctly? For example, if your
> celldm(1) and celldm(3) before relax are a and c. Lets say after
> relax, they become 1.1a and 1.2c. In the final scf calculation, new a
> should be 1.1a and and new c shsould be (1.2/1.1)*c.
>
> I dont know if this is the case but just wanted to tell that. Not much
> help can be done until more input is provided.
>
> Hope this helps
> Vikas
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:37 PM, WANG Wei <wonvein at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear QE users,
> >
> > Why are the total energy and press of the final step of vc-relax
> > calculation different from those of the scf calculation using the same
> > structure? Especially for the values of press, what makes this great
> > difference between the final step of vc-relax calculation and the final
> scf
> > calculation (after the vc-relax calculation)?
> >
> > (1) For the final step of vc-relax calculation, the press and total
> energy
> > are:
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> > ! total energy = -73.74310183 Ry
> >
> > total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P=
> > -0.03
> > -0.00000009 0.00000001 0.00000000 -0.01 0.00 0.00
> > 0.00000001 -0.00000008 0.00000000 0.00 -0.01 0.00
> > 0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.00000048 0.00 0.00 -0.07
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> >
> > (2) For the final scf calculations, the press and total energy are:
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> > ! total energy = -74.60031750 Ry
> >
> > total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P=
> > 638.94
> > 0.00760001 -0.00000151 0.00000000 1118.00 -0.22 0.00
> > -0.00000151 0.00759826 0.00000000 -0.22 1117.74 0.00
> > 0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.00216804 0.00 0.00 -318.93
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> >
> > Regards,
> > WANG
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110702/9748479c/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list