[Pw_forum] why don't I get an integer magnetization in a finite system
lfhuang
lfhuang at theory.issp.ac.cn
Tue Jan 25 06:55:28 CET 2011
Dear E. A. M. Proupin:
> total magnetization = 2.79 Bohr mag/cell
Do you expect it to be 4.00 Bohr? If yes, it may be due to the smearing technique you used.
> In this case, with an even number of electrons, it should be 0, 2, 4, or 2N.
It could also be 0, 0, ..., or 0 (Bohr), which is dependent on the interaction of electrons in your system.
> b) smearing. occupations = 'smearing', smearing = 'cold', degauss = 0.02,
The smearing technique could influence the magnetization moment, you may get more reasonable results by decreasing "degauss" down to 0.005 or lower (even 0.00).
> And the solution is
> c) tot_magnetization = 2, ! or any even numbe
It is not different from setting "tot_magnetization = 1.0" PS: the smearing technique is very helpful in some cases, like optimization of lattice constants, relaxation of atomic positions, reaction-path searching et al., but sometimes, it may not be a good choice in precise description of electronic structures.
May these be somewhat helpful.
Best Wishes!
Yours Sincerely
L. F. Huang
------
======================================================================
L.F.Huang(黄良锋) DFT and phonon physics
======================================================================
Add: Research Laboratory for Computational Materials Sciences,
Instutue of Solid State Physics,the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
P.O.Box 1129, Hefei 230031, P.R.China
Tel: 86-551-5591464-326(office)
Fax: 86-551-5591434
Our group: http://theory.issp.ac.cn
======================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110125/9a76136f/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list