[Pw_forum] RE : A question on atomic magnetic moments
Giovani Faccin
faccin.giovani at gmail.com
Mon Feb 14 05:50:36 CET 2011
Dear Cyrille,
First of all, thanks for the reply on my post.
Following your suggestion, I've run a few calculations with lower degauss
values. In particular, the ones reported on the message for Duy Le were made
with a much smaller value ( 0.005 ) than the original 0.02 from the first
message. Besides that, I've tried degauss values as low as 0.002 without any
significant improvement on the final magnetization.
I'm still wondering how do people find 6.00 so easily for the magnetization.
I'm trying with 2 different DFT codes and no way I'm reaching those results,
even though bulk/dimer equilibrium distances and force constants appear to
be ok.
Any other ideas, just tell me, I'll try it and report back on the list.
Thanks again,
Giovani
2011/2/13 BARRETEAU Cyrille <cyrille.barreteau at cea.fr>
> Dear Giovani
> Try to decrease the degauss value of your smearing.. and see what happens.
>
> cyrille
>
>
> ==================================================================
> Cyrille Barreteau
> phone : +33 (0)1 69 08 29 51
> CEA Saclay fax
> : +33 (0)1 69 08 84 46
> IRAMIS, SPCSI, Batiment 462 email
> cyrille.barreteau at cea.fr
> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex
> FRANCE
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Web: http://iramis.cea.fr/Pisp/cyrille.barreteau/
> ==================================================================
>
> ________________________________
>
> De: pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org de la part de Giovani Faccin
> Date: dim. 13/02/2011 07:16
> À: PWSCF Forum
> Objet : Re: [Pw_forum] A question on atomic magnetic moments
>
>
> Dear Paolo,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Just to make sure that the simulation cell size is not an issue (so that
> the system is really finite), I've tested different possibilities, including
> some quite big cells. Still, after a certain size the value of the
> magnetization is converging to 6.82 instead of the expected 6.
>
> So something else is causing this. Unfortunately I've got no clue as to
> what could it be.
>
> Should it be of any help, this is my input file:
>
>
> &CONTROL
> calculation = 'scf' ,
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> wf_collect = .true. ,
> outdir = './output' ,
> pseudo_dir = '../pseudo/' ,
> prefix = 'fe' ,
> etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-9 ,
> forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-6 ,
> tstress = .true. ,
> tprnfor = .true. ,
> /
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav = 1,
> celldm(1) = 43,
> nat = 2,
> ntyp = 1,
> ecutwfc = 100 ,
> ecutrho = 300 ,
> occupations = 'smearing' ,
> degauss = 0.02 ,
> smearing = 'methfessel-paxton' ,
> nspin = 2 ,
> starting_magnetization(1) = 1.0,
> /
> &ELECTRONS
> conv_thr = 1.0e-9 ,
> mixing_beta = 0.7 ,
> diagonalization = 'david' ,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Fe 58.69000 Fe.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
> Fe 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
> Fe 2.047510 0.000000000 0.000000000
> K_POINTS automatic
> 1 1 1 1 1 1
>
> Any suggestions are highly welcome.
>
> Giovani
>
>
>
> 2011/2/12 Paolo Giannozzi <giannozz at democritos.it>
>
>
>
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 17:09 , Giovani Faccin wrote:
>
> > My question: shouldn't those numbers be integers?
>
>
> only in finite systems, if you neglect spin-orbit.
>
> P.
> ---
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Giovani
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
--
Giovani
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110214/6b387d96/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list