[Pw_forum] Problems with magnetic moment of fcc iron Buldashev Ivan
Иван Булдашев
buldashev.ivan at mail.ru
Fri Dec 30 05:09:43 CET 2011
Dear QE users,
I studied the antiferromagnetic solution for fcc iron.
This is my input:
&control
calculation='scf'
restart_mode='from_scratch',
pseudo_dir = '/home/buldashev/QE/pseudo/',
outdir='/home/buldashev/tmp/',
disk_io='high'
/
&system
ibrav= 7,
celldm(1) = 5.20,
celldm(3) = 1.41421356,
nat= 2,
ntyp= 2,
ecutwfc = 30,
ecutrho = 120,
nbnd = 18,
nspin = 2,
starting_magnetization(1)=0.5,
starting_magnetization(2)=-0.5,
occupations='smearing',
smearing='mp',
degauss=0.04,
/
&electrons
mixing_beta = 0.05,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Fe1 55.845 Fe.pbe-sp-van.UPF
Fe2 55.845 Fe.pbe-sp-van.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS
Fe1 0 0 0
Fe2 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
K_POINTS {automatic}
14 14 14 0 0 0
As a result, with different parameters (nbnd=16,20; mixing_beta=0.01-0.9; smearing='mp','mv'; celldm(1) = 4-8; and different ecutwfc), were found only a non-magnetic solution, that is total magnetization = 0, absolute magnetization = 0. Nevertheless, we know that there is an antiferromagnetic solution for fcc iron. Could you please indicate the reason for the differences, or at least papers in which was solved a similar problem?
Thank you.
Buldashev Ivan, student.
South Ural State University.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20111230/7cbe50c9/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list