[Pw_forum] Problem with Ni/Ni3Al system
elbuesta at icqmail.com
elbuesta at icqmail.com
Tue Aug 30 11:34:09 CEST 2011
Dear Adriano,
I just tested your input here in our cluster I was not able to reproduce your error. When does it occur, is it in the end of the optimization?
Fabio Negreiros Ribeiro
CNR - Pisa
Il giorno 29/ago/2011, alle ore 20.10, <martins at if.uff.br> <martins at if.uff.br> ha scritto:
Dear all,
I'm trying to study the Ni/Ni3Al system. For starting, I built a Nx =
Ny = Nz = 2 supercell (the Ni and Ni3Al lattice parameters are very
close), resulting a 32 atoms system. The input file is:
&control
calculation = 'vc-relax'
restart_mode= 'from_scratch'
prefix='NiNi3Al'
tstress = .true.
tprnfor = .true.
pseudo_dir = '/home/martins/programas/espresso-4.2.1/pseudo/',
outdir='/home/martins/calculos/QE/NiNi3Al/32at/'
/
&system
ibrav = 1,
celldm(1) = 13.45,
nat = 32,
ntyp = 2,
ecutwfc = 50.0,
nspin = 2,
starting_magnetization(1) = 0.0,
starting_magnetization(2) = 0.2,
occupations = 'smearing',
smearing = 'mv',
degauss = 0.02,
/
&electrons
diagonalization='david'
mixing_mode = 'plain'
mixing_beta = 0.7
conv_thr = 1.0d-6
/
&ions
ion_dynamics = 'bfgs'
/
&cell
cell_dynamics = 'bfgs'
cell_dofree = 'z'
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Al 26.981 Al.pbe-sp-van.UPF
Ni 58.693 Ni.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Ni 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Ni 0.00000 1.77936 1.77936
Ni 1.77936 1.77936 0.00000
Ni 1.77936 0.00000 1.77936
Ni 3.55872 0.00000 0.00000
Ni 3.55872 1.77936 1.77936
Ni 5.33807 1.77936 0.00000
Ni 5.33807 0.00000 1.77936
Ni 0.00000 3.55872 0.00000
Ni 0.00000 5.33807 1.77936
Ni 1.77936 5.33807 0.00000
Ni 1.77936 3.55872 1.77936
Ni 3.55872 3.55872 0.00000
Ni 3.55872 5.33807 1.77936
Ni 5.33807 5.33807 0.00000
Ni 5.33807 3.55872 1.77936
Al 0.00000 0.00000 3.55872
Ni 0.00000 1.77936 5.33807
Ni 1.77936 1.77936 3.55872
Ni 1.77936 0.00000 5.33807
Al 3.55872 0.00000 3.55872
Ni 3.55872 1.77936 5.33807
Ni 5.33807 1.77936 3.55872
Ni 5.33807 0.00000 5.33807
Al 0.00000 3.55872 3.55872
Ni 0.00000 5.33807 5.33807
Ni 1.77936 5.33807 3.55872
Ni 1.77936 3.55872 5.33807
Al 3.55872 3.55872 3.55872
Ni 3.55872 5.33807 5.33807
Ni 5.33807 5.33807 3.55872
Ni 5.33807 3.55872 5.33807
K_POINTS automatic
2 2 2 0 0 0
However, I've got the following error message:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
task # 0
from cdiaghg : error # 201
diagonalization (ZHEGV*) failed
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
I did some variations on the input parameters (CG instead of DAVID,
DAMP instead of BFGS, ...) and the calculation continue to giving the
same error message. Are there some problem with my input file? Any
suggestion?
I appreciate any help. Best regards,
Adriano
------------------------------------
Adriano de Souza Martins
Professor Adjunto III
Departamento de Física - ICEx
Polo Universitário de Volta Redonda
Universidade Federal Fluminense
------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110830/1bbfaa94/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list