[Pw_forum] RE : why are there two Fermi energies?

[BARRETEAU Cyrille]

Dear Eduardo
 
Let me precise a little this point.
If you do a fixed total moment calculation as explained by Lorenzo you get two different Fermi energies.
You can also plot E(M) ie the total energy with respect to the total magnetization. You will then find a minimum of energy (or several ones if you have metastable solutions) for a given M0. This M0 corresponds to the true ground state and for this particular case the two Fermi energies are aligned..
 
hth
 
  cyrille
 
================================================================== 
Cyrille Barreteau                                                      phone : +33 (0)1 69 08 29 51 
CEA Saclay                                                             fax :      +33 (0)1 69 08 84 46 
IRAMIS, SPCSI,    Batiment 462                            email     cyrille.barreteau at cea.fr 
91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex 
FRANCE 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
Web: http://iramis.cea.fr/Pisp/cyrille.barreteau/ 
==================================================================

________________________________

De: pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org de la part de Lorenzo Paulatto
Date: jeu. 21/04/2011 11:00
À: PWSCF Forum
Objet : Re: [Pw_forum] why are there two Fermi energies?




On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:35:39 +0200, Eduardo Ariel Menendez Proupin 
<eariel99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why are there two Fermi energies in certain spin-polarized calculations ?
>
> input             starting_magnetization(1) = 0.0,
>                     starting_magnetization(2) = 0.5,
> output      the Fermi energy is     6.1598 ev
>                !    total energy              =    -502.92538790 Ry
>
> input           tot_magnetization = 1
> output     the spin up/dw Fermi energies are     6.3821    6.1598 ev
>               !    total energy              =    -502.92538790 Ry
>
> What is the meaning of the spin up Fermi level in the second case?

Dear Eduardo, if you force the system to have a certain magnetization 
(i.e. setting tot_magnetization) you are actually asking to occupy the 
"up" spin orbital more then the "down" spin ones, i.e. you have more up 
electrons then down electrons. This is achieved by filling the up orbitals 
up to a higher energy than the down orbitals, by setting two distinct 
Fermi energies.

On the other hand, if you only set starting magnetization, you get the 
computational ground state, where up and down orbitals are be filled up to 
the same level; what changes is the KS eigenvalues.

hth, lorenzo


>
> This numbers are for a 64 atoms Si unit cell with one Si replaced by Al, 
> and
> only one k-point, but the same happens with more k-points. I also used 
> Fermi
> smearing with a very low smearing.
>  There is a difference if I set the starting magnetization or the total
> magnetization, with pw.x version 4.2.1. However, despite reporting 
> different
> Fermi levels, the total energy and magnetization are equal. Also are 
> equal
> KS energies, at least around the Fermi levels.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eduardo Menendez
> Departamento de Fisica
> Facultad de Ciencias
> Universidad de Chile
> Phone: (56)(2)9787439
> URL: http://fisica.ciencias.uchile.cl/~emenendez


--
Lorenzo Paulatto (IdR)
IMPMC - CNRS UMR 7590 & Université P&M Curie
T23-C23/24-4e16 - 4 place Jussieu - 75252 Paris Cedex5
phone: +33 (0)144 27 5211
www:   http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 8646 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110421/d6eee42b/attachment.bin>