[Pw_forum] new bfgs: strange behavior doing vc-relax
max.n.popov at gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 11:59:51 CEST 2011
Dear Stefano de Gironcoli,
2011/4/19 Stefano de Gironcoli <degironc at sissa.it>
> have you bothered looking at the output ? has the bfgs procedure
> converged ?
Yes, I have looked. If you look carefully at one of the previous posts,
that bfgs procedure converged.
> Notice that in recent versions of vcrelax one additional scf
> calculation is performed at the final configuration reinitializing
> reciprocal lattice vectors .
This has been already explained by Dr. Giannozzi in previous posts too.
> this has nothing to do with the bfgs procedure. it's a check to
> verify what is the impact of the deformation of the cutoff "sphere"
> induced by the cell-shape change.
My question is exactly about this. More specific: why deformed cutoff
"sphere" gives lower total energy compared to undeformed one?
> if the cutoff is large enough the change should be very small. 0.5
> mRy looks small to me.
Is there any criteria for an energy difference to be called "small"?
Best regards, Max Popov
Materials center Leoben (MCL), Leoben, Austria.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users