[Pw_forum] Bilayer graphene with an electric field applied
Elie Moujaes
elie.moujaes at hotmail.co.uk
Tue Sep 28 22:41:52 CEST 2010
Dear all,
I
I am trying to get the band structure of graphene under the effect of an electric field. The problem is that the result at the end is very messy and jiggly. I repeated the calculations many times but I still get the same result. I first performed a scf calculation without the electric field followed by a scf calculation with an electric field and then the band calculation.
SCF with no electric field:
control
prefix='bi elgraphene',
calculation='scf',
restart_mode='from_scratch',
lelfield = .true.,
pseudo_dir = '/espresso-4.2/pseudo/',
outdir='/tmp/results_MOUJAES/'
/
&system
ibrav= 4, celldm(1) =4.608737, celldm(3)=5.330410, nat=4, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc = 110.D0,occupations='smearing', smearing='methfessel-paxton', degauss=0.01
/
&electrons
conv_thr=1.D-10,
mixing_mode='plain'
efield_cart(1) = 0.0,
efield_cart(2) = 0.0,
efield_cart(3) = 0.0,
startingwfc = 'random'
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.0107 C.pz-vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
C 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
C 0.000000 0.000000 0.257692
C 0.333333 -0.33333 0.000000
C -0.333333 0.33333 0.257692
K_POINTS automatic
38 38 1 0 0 0
SCF with electric field
&control
prefix='bi elgraphene',
calculation='scf',
restart_mode='from_scratch',
lelfield = .true.,
pseudo_dir = '/espresso-4.2/pseudo/',
outdir='/tmp/results_MOUJAES/'
/
&system
ibrav= 4, celldm(1) =4.608737, celldm(3)=5.330410, nat=4, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc = 110.D0,occupations='smearing',smearing='methfessel-paxton', degauss=0.01
/
&electrons
conv_thr=1.D-10,
mixing_mode='plain'
efield_cart(1) = 0.0,
efield_cart(2) = 0.0,
efield_cart(3) = 0.001,
startingwfc = 'random'
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.0107 C.pz-vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
C 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
C 0.000000 0.000000 0.257692
C 0.333333 -0.33333 0.000000
C -0.333333 0.33333 0.257692
K_POINTS automatic
38 38 1 0 0 0
I noticed that part of the bands calculation output had a problem with the convergence of one of thh eigenavalues as some of the input looked like:
per-process dynamical memory: 30.2 Mb
Band Structure Calculation
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 1 eigenvalues not converged
Please can anyone suggest me of what could have gone wrong...
Thanks
Elie Moujaes
University of Nottingham
NG7 2RD
UK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100928/68755545/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list