[Pw_forum] vc-relax problem when calculate lattice parameters

mohnish pandey mohnish.iitk at gmail.com
Wed Sep 15 05:44:31 CEST 2010


Dear Wang,
                    This is a common error when you are very far from
equilibrium. Start with the experimental value of the lattice parameter. Or
you can take the lattice parameter from the point where the calculation
crashes, this may also work(but might fail when you are very far from
equilibrium). And next time please mention your affiliation.

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Wang Di <didi5158 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all:
> i wish to calculate the Raman spectra of the crystal with espresso 4.1.1
> package. However, the  calculated frequencies included negative value.
> According to the pwscf manual, the unstable structure or the bad scf
> calculation cause the negative value, I know the structure of the material
> is stable below the melt point, so I perform the relax of the atom position,
> and change difference PP (GGA, LDA) to test. Unlucky, the changes still
> exist the negative frequencies and the calculated frequencies different from
> the experimental value totally.  recently, according to some references
> about the Raman spectra calculation with espresso, the optimization of
> lattice parameters is needed, I performing vc-relax calculation, but the job
> stop with the error that
>
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>      from scale_h : error #         1
>      Not enough space allocated for radial FFT: try restarting with a
> larger cell_factor.
>
>  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> according previous questions in mail list, the error means the G value
> change too much. From the out file, the first step scf calculation, the
> total force was so small
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Total force =     0.000027     Total SCF correction =     0.000004
>      SCF correction compared to forces is too large, reduce conv_thr
>
>
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)
> P=-3539.67
>   -0.02405899   0.00000000   0.00000000      -3539.20      0.00      0.00
>    0.00000000  -0.02405899   0.00000000          0.00  -3539.20      0.00
>    0.00000000   0.00000000  -0.02406857          0.00      0.00  -3540.61
>
>
>      BFGS Geometry Optimization
>
>      number of scf cycles    =   1
>      number of bfgs steps    =   0
>
>      enthalpy new            =    -573.6572611922 Ry
>
>      new trust radius        =       0.2000000000 bohr
>      new conv_thr            =            1.0E-10 Ry
>
>      new unit-cell volume =   1258.11889 a.u.^3 (   186.43398 Ang^3 )
>
> CELL_PARAMETERS (alat)
>    0.963490012   0.000000000   0.000000000
>   -0.481745006   0.834406827   0.000000000
>    0.000000000   0.000000000   1.854979314
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> the bfge calculation go on in 3 step and stop with the above error.  the
> input file:
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  &CONTROL
>                  calculation = 'vc-relax' ,
>                 restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
>                   wf_collect = .true. ,
>                       outdir = '/lustre/AIOFM/gxgu/workLCAF/temp/' ,
>                       wfcdir = '/lustre/AIOFM/gxgu/workLCAF/wftemp/' ,
>                   pseudo_dir = '/home/AIOFM/gxgu/work/NCPP/' ,
>                       prefix = 'LCAF' ,
>                etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-7 ,
>                forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-6 ,
>                        nstep = 100 ,
>                      tstress = .true. ,
>                      tprnfor = .true. ,
>                     dipfield = .true. ,
>  /
>  &SYSTEM
>                        ibrav = 4,
>                    celldm(1) = 9.4490,
>                    celldm(3) = 1.9253,
>                          nat = 18,
>                         ntyp = 4,
>                      ecutwfc = 30 ,
>                      ecutrho = 120 ,
>                        nosym = .true. ,
>  /
>  &ELECTRONS
>             electron_maxstep = 100,
>                     conv_thr = 1.0D-10 ,
>  /
> &IONs
>                 ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> /
> &CELL
>                cell_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
>    Li    6.94100  03-Li.LDA.fhi.UPF
>    Al   26.98154  13-Al.LDA.fhi.UPF
>    Ca   40.07800  20-Ca.LDA.fhi.UPF
>     F   18.99840  09-F.LDA.fhi.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>    Li      0.333333333    0.666666667    0.250000000
>    Li      0.666666667    0.333333333    0.750000000
>     F      0.375595671    0.008455746    0.142528376
>     F      0.991544254    0.367139925    0.142528376
>     F      0.632860075    0.624404329    0.142528376
>     F      0.991544254    0.624404329    0.357471624
>     F      0.632860075    0.008455746    0.357471624
>     F      0.375595671    0.367139925    0.357471624
>     F      0.624404329    0.991544254    0.857471624
>     F      0.008455746    0.632860075    0.857471624
>     F      0.367139925    0.375595671    0.857471624
>     F      0.008455746    0.375595671    0.642528376
>     F      0.367139925    0.991544254    0.642528376
>     F      0.624404329    0.632860075    0.642528376
>    Al      0.666666667    0.333333333    0.250000000
>    Al      0.333333333    0.666666667    0.750000000
>    Ca      0.000000000    0.000000000    0.000000000
>    Ca      0.000000000    0.000000000    0.500000000
> K_POINTS automatic
>   16 16 16   0 0 0
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Do you have some advises for the solution the case or elimination the Raman
> negative frequencies, any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance
>  Wang Di
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>


-- 
Regards,
MOHNISH,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mohnish Pandey
Y6927262,5th Year dual degree student,
Department of Chemical Engineering,
IIT KANPUR, UP, INDIA
+919235721300
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100915/02958e6c/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list