[Pw_forum] Re [7] : US-PP of Au
Gabriele Sclauzero
sclauzer at sissa.it
Tue Sep 14 17:48:36 CEST 2010
Dear Reza,
Le 13-set-2010 à 20:49, reza shidpoor <rezashidpoor at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Dear Gabriele
>
> Thank you for your comments in pwscf forum.
>
> I performed your suggestion that ecut is set to 32 Ry. The structure was relaxed
So you can confirm that with this cutoff it works, do you?
> and I repeated with ecut=20 , 22 Ry.
Why do you want to do so?
If the cutoff id too low the forces are not described correctly and the ralaxation algorithm might fail to converge.
> It seems that the structure did not relaxed with this point "
>
> .............
> ...........
> the Fermi energy is -5.0636 ev
>
> ! total energy = -262.94392529 Ry
> Harris-Foulkes estimate = -262.94392533 Ry
> estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000006 Ry
>
> The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
>
> one-electron contribution = -323.90644330 Ry
> hartree contribution = 178.85727642 Ry
> xc contribution = -104.02662243 Ry
> ewald contribution = -13.85257067 Ry
> smearing contrib. (-TS) = -0.01556530 Ry
>
> convergence has been achieved in 2 iterations
>
> Forces acting on atoms (Ry/au):
>
>
> negative rho (up, down): 0.998E-04 0.000E+00
> atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00000000 0.00223711 0.00000000
> atom 2 type 1 force = -0.00165978 -0.00111856 0.00000000
> atom 3 type 1 force = 0.00165978 -0.00111856 0.00000000
>
> Total force = 0.003608 Total SCF correction = 0.000988
> SCF correction compared to forces is too large, reduce conv_thr
Besides increasing the cutoff, you might need to decrease this threshold on order for the forces to be perfectly consistent with the total energy.
>
> The maximum number of steps has been reached.
>
> End of BFGS Geometry Optimization
> Begin final coordinates
>
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS (angstrom)
> Au 0.000000000 0.248435531 0.000000000
> Au -2.339313337 1.325352234 0.000000000
> Au 2.339313337 1.325352234 0.000000000
> End final coordinates
>
> ........................
> ........................
>
> Questions :
>
> 1) The electron_maxstep is equaled 100. What is purpose of "number of states" ?
???
You are confusing number of states with number of electrpnic steps and perhaps also with ionic steps. Please spend some time reading the manual and some examples or tutorials.
>
> 2) Should I consider system to be semiconducting If I want to simulate 4-atoms cluster?
If you are not sure, you can treat your system as metallic with a small smearing and then, if it turns out to have a gap, reduce/remove the smearing.
GS
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Reza.Shidpour
> SUT
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100914/016cd9ca/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list