[Pw_forum] Zn NCPP pseudopotential

giacsport at libero.it giacsport at libero.it
Wed Jun 16 05:55:37 CEST 2010



Dear All,
             excuse me if the question maybe can appear as "weird" but I am 
quite new with PWSCF.

I would like to do some calculations on ZnO systems by using NCPP (in 
principle PBE at this level could be OK)

Anyway, I checked the database of pseudopotentials and I noticed that an NCPP 
for Zn is missing.
Reading the suggestions in the Doc  I went to the Rappe Group PSP Page for 
GGA 
generated Potentials and I found Zn psp in abinit (fhi) format.
( http://www.sas.upenn.edu/rappegroup/htdocs/Research/PSP/zn.optgga1.fhi )

I used the "fhi2upf" tools  following the instructions required and thus I 
generated both a NCPP for both Zn and O.
(In details     Zn  4S,2 4P,0 3d,10 3f,0      and     O 2S,2  2P,4)
then I tested it on a "vc-relax' calculation on the WZ-like structure of ZnO


  this is my input file

>&control
>  calculation='vc-relax',
>  pseudo_dir='/home/giacomo/src/pseudo/'
>  prefix='ZnO'
>  wf_collect=.true.
>  outdir='/scr/giacomo/PWSCF_test/ZnO/test_pseudo/'
>  tprnfor=.true.
>  etot_conv_thr=1.0D-8
>  forc_conv_thr=1.0D-4
>/
>&system
> ntyp=2, nat=4, ibrav=4, a=3.2417, c= 5.18760,
> ecutwfc= 30., force_symmorphic=.true.
>/
>&ELECTRONS
>    diagonalization='david'
>    mixing_mode = 'plain'
>    mixing_beta = 0.7
>    conv_thr =  1.0d-8
>/
>&IONS
>  ion_dynamics = 'bfgs',
>/
>&cell
>        cell_dynamics='bfgs'
>/
>ATOMIC_SPECIES
>Zn 65.39   30-Zn.PBE.fhi.UPF
>O  15.9994  08-O.PBE.fhi.UPF
>ATOMIC_POSITIONS  crystal
>  Zn    0.33330   0.66670   0.00000
>  Zn    0.66660   0.33330   0.50000
>  O     0.33330   0.66670   0.38190
>  O     0.66660   0.33330   0.88190
>K_POINTS (automatic)
> 4 4 4 1 1 1



and this is what I got in the output:

.....
>     bravais-lattice index     =            4
>     lattice parameter (a_0)   =       6.1259  a.u.
>     unit-cell volume          =     318.5953 (a.u.)^3
>     number of atoms/cell      =            4
>     number of atomic types    =            2
>     number of electrons       =        36.00
>     number of Kohn-Sham states=           18
>     kinetic-energy cutoff     =      30.0000  Ry
>     charge density cutoff     =     120.0000  Ry
>     convergence threshold     =      1.0E-08
>     mixing beta               =       0.7000
>     number of iterations used =            8  plain     mixing
>     Exchange-correlation      = SLA  PZ   NOGX NOGC (1100)
>     nstep                     =           50
>
>
>     celldm(1)=   6.125925  celldm(2)=   0.000000  celldm(3)=   1.600271
>     celldm(4)=   0.000000  celldm(5)=   0.000000  celldm(6)=   0.000000
>
>     crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of a_0)
>               a(1) = (  1.000000  0.000000  0.000000 )
>               a(2) = ( -0.500000  0.866025  0.000000 )
>               a(3) = (  0.000000  0.000000  1.600271 )
>....
>     Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
>     Check: negative starting charge=   -0.000653
>
>     starting charge   35.99993, renormalised to   36.00000
>.....


and at the end

>.....
>     bfgs converged in  13 scf cycles and  11 bfgs steps
>     (criteria: energy < 0.10E-07, force < 0.10E-03, cell < 0.50E+00)
>
>     End of BFGS Geometry Optimization
>
>     Final enthalpy =    -269.5939008350 Ry
>     new unit-cell volume =    196.26255 a.u.^3 (    29.08311 Ang^3 )
>
>CELL_PARAMETERS (alat)
>   0.850885542  -0.000000001   0.000009624
>  -0.425442771   0.736893797  -0.000004810
>   0.000015404   0.000000004   1.361589938
>
>ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
>Zn       0.333283929   0.666666020   0.000176085
>Zn       0.666617909   0.333333981   0.500176085
>O        0.333282225   0.666666288   0.381723915
>O        0.666615937   0.333333711   0.881723915
>
>......

that makes me very suspicious about a so big reduction of the unit-cell 
volume.
I know that there are a lot of variables that can influence this result (not 
only the pseudopotential), but since I am a dummy in creating them I wonder 
if 
someone can give me few hints in order to improve my ones. or even better if 
someone could share an already tested  NCPP at PBE level I would really 
appreciate it. 

Thanks in advance

Very best,
Giacomo


Giacomo Giorgi, Ph. D.,
Department of Chemical System Engineering,
School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo,
Japan 




More information about the users mailing list