[Pw_forum] Unit cell problem
mohsen modaresi
modaresi.mohsen at gmail.com
Wed Jun 2 19:34:48 CEST 2010
Dear users,
I work on ZnS, I faced with a problem. When i use a unit cell with 2 atom
every things is OK and the bandstructure has a very good agreement with
previous calculation but when i use bigger unit cell every things go wrong,
Where is the problem of my calculation?
I set my input files for a unit cell with 2 & 16 atoms at below.
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 2,
celldm(1) =10.221527872,
nbnd = 50,
nat = 2,
ntyp = 2,
ecutwfc = 40 ,
ecutrho = 160 ,
occupations = 'fixed' ,
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 0.0000001 ,
diago_full_acc = .TRUE.,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Zn 65.409 zn_pz.upf
S 32.066 s_pz.upf
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
Zn 0.0 0.0 0.0
S 1.352 1.352 1.352
K_POINTS {automatic}
6 6 6 0 0 0
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 2,
celldm(1) =20.446835196 ,
nbnd = 90,
nat = 16,
ntyp = 2,
ecutwfc = 40 ,
ecutrho = 160 ,
occupations = 'fixed' ,
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 0.0000001 ,
diago_full_acc = .TRUE.,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Zn 65.409 zn_pz.upf
S 32.066 s_pz.upf
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
Zn 0.0 0.0 0.0
Zn 2.705 2.705 0.0
Zn 2.705 0.0 2.705
Zn 5.409 2.705 2.705
Zn 0.0 2.705 2.705
Zn 2.705 5.409 2.705
Zn 2.705 2.705 5.409
Zn 5.409 5.409 5.409
S 1.352 1.352 1.352
S 4.057 4.057 1.352
S 4.057 1.352 4.057
S 6.762 4.057 4.057
S 1.352 4.057 4.057
S 4.057 6.762 4.057
S 4.057 4.057 6.762
S 6.762 6.762 6.762
K_POINTS {automatic}
5 5 5 0 0 0
Thanks for your answers
Mohsen Modarsei
Ferdowsi University, Iran.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100602/2c97eb5d/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list