[Pw_forum] vc-relax time
Masoud Nahali
masoudnahali at live.com
Mon Jul 12 20:24:30 CEST 2010
Dear Quantum Espresso Users
I vc-relaxed a (1*1) slab of graphite surface with 3 layers; It takes 20
minutes with parallel running by 4 CPUs. Then I used the exact optimized
cell parameters (obtained from vc-relaxed calculation) to make a (2*2) slab
of graphite with 3 layers and I expected to see the results in a few
minutes. But amazingly it took 17 hours to complete. 48 steps were done in
the calculation for vc-relaxing the cell which have the parameters that had
been optimized before. The cell parameters only change a very bit in the
current vc-relaxing the (2*2) slab. I appreciate if one explain the physical
procedure of vc-relaxing and the reason of the time needed for the
computation.
input file:
CONTROL
calculation = "vc-relax",
pseudo_dir = "/home/koa/soft/qe4.2/
espresso-4.2/pseudo",
outdir = "/home/koa/tmp",
etot_conv_thr= 1.0D-4,
forc_conv_thr= 1.0D-3,
dt=80,
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 4,
a = 2.4579,
b = 2.4579,
c = 16.3069,
cosab = -0.5,
cosac = 1.0,
cosbc = 1.0,
nat = 6,
ntyp = 1,
ecutwfc = 40.D0,
ecutrho = 480.D0,
occupations = 'smearing'
smearing ='mp',
degauss = 0.03,
nspin = 2,
starting_magnetization(1)= 0.003,
london=.true.,
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 1.D-6,
mixing_beta = 0.7D0,
diagonalization = "david",
/
&IONS
ion_dynamics="cg"
/
&CELL
cell_dynamics = 'damp-w',
press = 0.0,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C 12.0107 C.pbe-rrkjus.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
C 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 1 1 0
C 0.00000000 1.41908472 0.00000000
C 0.00000000 0.00000000 3.15347111
C 11.22896342 0.70954236 3.15347111
C 0.00000000 0.00000000 6.30694222
C 0.00000000 1.41908472 6.30694222
K_POINTS {automatic}
4 4 1 1 1 1
Sincerely Yours
Masoud Nahali
SUT
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100712/c4b6a18b/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list