[Pw_forum] Zone centre phonons in ZrO2 ?
sonu kumar
1009ukumar at gmail.com
Tue Jul 6 12:13:00 CEST 2010
Dear all Quantum Espresso users and developers,
I am not able to reproduce the zone cente phonons in ZrO2 calculated
in PRL 78, 21, 1997.
My results, without LO-TO splitting(can be calculated, once accoustical
mode=0 cm-1 ) are:
T1u: 14.27 cm-1 <---------not zero
T1u: 219.6 cm-1
T2g: 550.35cm-1
I am not able to make the accoustical mode=0 cm-1.
Although the born charges and dielectric constants are
ok with relative error~1%.
Input files:-----------------------------------------------
scf file:
&control
calculation='scf', ! relax,self consistent calc.
verbosity='high',
restart_mode='from_scratch', ! 'from_scratch',
prefix='ZrO2',
wf_collect=.true., ! collect wave func in ./ZrO2.save
tstress=.true.,
tprnfor=.true.,
nstep=100, ! default=50
dt=20, !10, ! default=20
etot_conv_thr=1.0D-5, ! default=1.0D-4
forc_conv_thr=1.0D-5, !1.0D-4, default=1.0D-3
pseudo_dir = './',
outdir='./',
/
&system
ibrav = 2,
celldm(1)=9.67
nat=3, ntyp=2,
! nbnd= ! can calculate itself
ecutwfc=30, !50, !in Ry, no default,
initially=60
ecutrho=350, !350 !300, ! 8*50=400
! nr1=14,
! nr2=14,
! nr3=14,
! nr1s=14,
! nr2s=14,
! nr3s=14,
! nosym=.true.,
nspin=1, ! 1,2,4, "noncolin=.true."
! input_dft= ! read from PP files.
/
&electrons
mixing_beta = 0.2, ! 0.7
conv_thr = 1.0d-12, ! default=1.0d-06, ! 1.0d-12,1.0d-8
diagonalization=cg ! 'cg',!'cg', 'david', !
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Zr 0.0000 Zr.pbe-nsp-van.UPF
O 0.0000 O.pbe-van_ak.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Zr 0.0 0.0 0.0
O 0.25 0.25 0.25
O 0.75 0.75 0.75
K_POINTS (automatic)
3 3 3 0 0 0 !8 8 8 0 0
0
ph file:----------------------------
&inputph
tr2_ph=1.0d-14, !1.0d-14, ! threshold for self
consistency=1.0d-12(default)
alpha_mix(1)=0.2, ! default=0.7
prefix='ZrO2',
iverbosity=1,
epsil=.true.,
trans=.true., ! default=true ,
asr=.true.,
zue=.true., ! eff charges
amass(1)=91.22400,
amass(2)=15.99940,
outdir='./',
fildyn='ZrO2.dynG', ! file where the dyn matrix is written
/
0.0 0.0 0.0
Effect of convergences (plane waves, k point sampling, augmentation
functions)
is checked. Forces are zero and press~1 kbar.
Bulk mod~233 GPa, expt~267Gpa => error~13 %.
Also,in above paper LDA pp was used, but i used USPP.
So in nutshell:---
i think USPP has to be modified or norm conserving pp should be
used.
I need your comments over this.
Thanks!!
With Regards,
Sonu Kumar
Phd Student
Physics Department
Indian Institute of Technology
Delhi-110016, India
web:-http://www.iitd.ac.in/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100706/80f3f35d/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list