[Pw_forum] Error: bfgs history already reset at previous step
vega lew
quantumdft at gmail.com
Thu Jan 7 06:28:30 CET 2010
Dear friend,
It might be a bug for QE 4.0.3. I recalculated it in QE 4.1.2. The
convergence is much better.
thank you for reading
best
vega
On 1/7/2010 13:26, mohnish pandey wrote:
> Dear Vega,
> Try reducing "trust_radius_min". I faced the same
> problem once and I did the same thing and it worked. Normally this
> happens near the convergence...
> HAPPY COMPUTING,
> MOHNISH,
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:11 AM, vega lew <quantumdft at gmail.com
> <mailto:quantumdft at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> I used to calculate the structure and the energy of Pt dimers
> (two Pt atoms) in a large supercell. I have tested various
> structure in triplet, which is most stable state for single Pt atom.
> But the code report errors after a few bfgs steps like this:
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> task # 0
> from bfgs : error # 1
> bfgs history already reset at previous step
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> I wondering how to deal with this situation.
> my input files is shown as follows,
> &CONTROL
> calculation = 'relax' ,
> restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> outdir = '/tmp/' ,
> wfcdir = '/tmp/' ,
> pseudo_dir = '/home/vega/espresso/pseudo/' ,
> disk_io = 'none' ,
> nstep = 1000 ,
> /
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav = 8,
> celldm(1) =24.8624,
> celldm(2) = 0.8520,
> celldm(3) = 1.6964,
> nat = 2,
> ntyp = 1,
> nosym = .true. ,
> ecutwfc = 30,
> ecutrho = 300,
> occupations = 'smearing',
> degauss = 0.007,
> nspin = 2,
> multiplicity = 3,
> /
> &ELECTRONS
> mixing_mode ='local-TF',
> mixing_beta = 0.4,
>
> /
> &IONS
> ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Pt 195.08 Pt.pw91-n-van.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
> Pt 0.540794031 0.322983976 0.495002098
> Pt 0.500777594 0.548429786 0.493029885
> K_POINTS gamma
> the input parameters might not very suitable for the calculation
> of Pt dimers itself. But the parameters should be consistent with
> the previous calculation, which is composed of two Pt atoms on
> certain surface slab model.
> So could any one give me some suggestions?
> Thank you for reading
> vega
>
> --
> ==================================================================================
> Vega Lew ( weijia liu)
> Graduate student
> State Key Laboratory of Materials-oriented Chemical Engineering
> College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
> Nanjing University of Technology, 210009, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
> ******************************************************************************************************************
> Email: vegalew at gmail.com <mailto:vegalew at gmail.com>
> Office: Room A705, Technical Innovation Building, Xinmofan Road
> 5#, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
> ******************************************************************************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mohnish Pandey
> Y6927262,4th Year dual degree student,
> Department of Chemical Engineering,
> IIT KANPUR
> 09235721300
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100107/7dd52750/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list