[Pw_forum] scf calculation for isolated hydrogen atoms
Gabriele Sclauzero
sclauzer at sissa.it
Mon Feb 15 09:33:27 CET 2010
Gabriele Sclauzero wrote:
>
> Try for instance to run ld1.x with the following input:
> &input
> title='H'
> prefix='H_',
> zed=1,
> config='1s1'
> iswitch=1,
> rel=0,
> dft='PZ'
> isic=1,
> /
>
> You get:
> n l nl e(Ry) e(Ha) e(eV)
> 1 0 1S 1( 1.00) -1.0000 -0.5000 -13.6057
>
> but if you use isic=0 you'll get:
>
> n l nl e(Ry) e(Ha) e(eV)
> 1 0 1S 1( 1.00) -0.4673 -0.2337 -6.3583
>
> which is much close to what you get from a pw.x LSDA calculation with fixed occupations in
> a very big cell (around -7.3 eV). There is still a 1 eV difference that I cannot explain,
> maybe it is due to something related to what you said.
> Or maybe I am completely mistaken and there is some point I cannot get.
I understood what was missing here: I was comparing LSDA calculations of pw.x with
non-spin-polarized calculations of ld1.x.
With the following input for ld1.x:
&input
title='H'
prefix='H_',
zed=1,
config='1s1'
iswitch=1,
rel=1,
lsd=1,
dft='PZ'
isic=0,
latt=0,
/
I got
n l nl e(Ry) e(Ha) e(eV)
1 0 1S 1( 1.00) -0.5383 -0.2691 -7.3239
1 0 1S 2( 0.00) -0.1666 -0.0833 -2.2673
while in the pw.x calculation I got:
------ SPIN UP ------------
k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 (136713 PWs) bands (ev):
-7.2894
------ SPIN DOWN ----------
k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 (136713 PWs) bands (ev):
-2.2862
So now the KS eigenvalues of pw.x and ld1.x calculations match within 0.05 eV.
HTH
GS
--
o ------------------------------------------------ o
| Gabriele Sclauzero, PhD Student |
| c/o: SISSA & CNR-INFM Democritos, |
| via Beirut 2-4, 34014 Trieste (Italy) |
| email: sclauzer at sissa.it |
| phone: +39 040 3787 511 |
| skype: gurlonotturno |
o ------------------------------------------------ o
More information about the users
mailing list