[Pw_forum] Inconsistencies in the CELL_PARAMETERS - ibrav=5

[Marino Vetuschi Zuccolini]

stefano

On 23 Dec 2010, at 16:44, Stefano de Gironcoli wrote:

> dear Marino Vetuschi Zuccolini,
> the input you give in attachment does not correspond to the situation 
> you are describing below...
> can you post a consistent set of input and output ?
> stefano
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: o_R_5
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 85958 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101223/c38bdcbb/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
 output
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: i_R_5
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1580 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101223/c38bdcbb/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
 input
> Marino Vetuschi Zuccolini wrote:
>> Hello to all,
>> 
>> I would like to propose to your attention an apparent inconsistency in the matrix of the CELL_PARAMETERS section that I noticed during a relaxation of a crystal with trigonal symmetry (ibrav=5, in attach).
>> These inconsistency arise writing few lines in output_tau.f90 to enable the code to print the crystal parameters celldm() for each optimization step.
>> 
>> This is the output of these few lines of code with a simple explanation
>> 
>> ...
>> New celldm() values
>> 
>> 1)  celldm(1) =  10.118244326   5.354344288	# new cell edge in bohr and angstrom
>> 2)  celldm(4) =   0.647279099			# cos(alpha) solved respect to c in tx
>> 3)  |tx|      =   0.419952914   0.419952914	# value of tx as reported in INPUT.PW and in the code
>> 						  compared with the element of the matrix at(1,1)
>> 4)  |ty|      =   0.242459928   0.242459928	# value of tx as reported in INPUT.PW and in the code
>> 						  compared with the element of the matrix at(2,1)
>> 5)  |tz|      =   0.874558593  >0.911266395<	# value of tx as reported in INPUT.PW and in the code
>> 						  compared with the element of the matrix at(3,1)
>> 6)   c_tx     =   0.647279099			# cos(alpha) solved respect to c in tx - redundant with 2)
>> 7)   c_ty     =   0.647279099			# cos(alpha) solved respect to c in ty
>> 8)   c_tz     =  >0.745609664<			# cos(alpha) solved respect to c in tz
>> ...
>> 
>> Points 5) and 8) seem to be not consistent as expected at least by me :)
>> 
>> Please, can someone explain where probably I'm going wrong?
>> 
>> Many thanks to all
>> 
>> m.
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *******************************************************
>> Marino Vetuschi Zuccolini
>> zucco at dipteris.unige.it
>> Researcher / Geochemist
>> Laboratory of Geochemistry
>> 
>> DIPartimento per lo studio della TErra e delle sue RISorse - Universit?  di Genova
>> Tel. ++39 010 3538136 Fax. ++39 010 352169
>> Corso Europa 26, 16132 - Genova - Italy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum



*******************************************************
Marino Vetuschi Zuccolini
zucco at dipteris.unige.it
Researcher / Geochemist
Laboratory of Geochemistry

DIPartimento per lo studio della TErra e delle sue RISorse - Universit?  di Genova
Tel. ++39 010 3538136 Fax. ++39 010 352169
Corso Europa 26, 16132 - Genova - Italy